BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 208clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai122Karnataka100Mumbai95Chandigarh62Ahmedabad55Kolkata54Delhi44Bangalore38Jaipur36Hyderabad24Pune22Surat15Indore14Cuttack11Rajkot10Lucknow8Cochin8Nagpur7Amritsar5Raipur4SC4Patna3Guwahati3Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Jabalpur2Agra2Orissa1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Telangana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 6812Section 12A4Section 143(3)3Section 2503Section 143(2)3Section 133A3Section 131(1)(d)3Addition to Income3Survey u/s 133A

ASSOCIATION OF REPUTED INSTITUTE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Raipur07 Apr 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.198/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2018-19 Association Of Reputed Institute Of School Education Arora Krishi Farm, Near Berla Road, Bijabhat, Bemetara, Durg-491 335 Pan: Aadaa1895M

For Appellant: Shri Yash Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 143(1)

208 ITD 677 and Sirur Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs. ACIT (2024) 166 taxmann.com 525 had provided relief to the assessee directing the CPC to provide exemption to the assessee holding that the requirement of Section 12A of the Act has been complied with since the assessee had filed audit report within the 4 Association of Reputed Institute of School Education

M/S TRIMURTHY FINVEST LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), BILASPUR

3

In the result, appeal of the assesse company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 19/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

208 ITR 465 (Cal.), observed that the mere fact that the transactions were carried out through banking channels would not conclusively establish the identity of the creditors or their creditworthiness. As regards the judicial pronouncements that were relied upon by the assessee company, the A.O. was of the view that as all of those were rendered before the amendment

M/S PURVI FINVEST LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1),, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 20/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

208 ITR 465 (Cal.), observed that the mere fact that the transactions were carried out through banking channels would not conclusively establish the identity of the creditors or their creditworthiness. As regards the judicial pronouncements that were relied 17 M/s. Purvi Finvest Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1) upon by the assessee company, the A.O. was of the view that

EAST WEST FINVEST INDIA LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BILASPR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 21/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

208 ITR 465 (Cal.), observed that the mere fact that the transactions were carried out through banking channels would not conclusively establish the identity of the creditors or their creditworthiness. As regards the judicial pronouncements that were relied upon by the assessee company, the A.O. was of the view that as all of those were rendered before the amendment