Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 161(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6 Section 2636 Section 271C6 Section 142A4 Section 69C2 Section 1532 Section 1332 Section 133A2 Addition to Income

PRANAV TRUST, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 177/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 177/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Pranav Trust Baniya Para, Durg-491 001 (C.G.)-491 001 Pan : Aabtp9694C .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 161(1)Section 164Section 164(1)

Section 161(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 and the tax is leviable at the normal rate applicable to Individual /AOP. 2. That the appellant does not nave any income from business or profession and, the share of the beneficiary is also specified/ determined being sole beneficiary hence levying tax at maximum marginal rate u/s.164(1) is wrong

PRANAV TRUST, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), BHILAI, DURG

PRANAV TRUST, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), BHILAI, DURG

SHREE KRISHNA BUILDERS,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

SHREE KRISHNA COLONISERS,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

JAGDISH PRASAD SINGHANIA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, RAIPUR, RAIPUR