BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune226Ahmedabad142Mumbai118Jaipur86Chennai77Kolkata51Delhi40Hyderabad33Surat27Chandigarh24Rajkot22Nagpur18Bangalore16Lucknow14Cochin11Amritsar11Indore10Visakhapatnam6Agra5Patna5Jabalpur4Panaji4Jodhpur3Raipur2Dehradun2Ranchi2Allahabad2Guwahati2

Key Topics

Section 12A5Section 80G(5)2Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 13(1)(b)2Exemption2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAT COMMITTEE ANJUMAN E EZZI, TAKHATPUR,BILASPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 130/RPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur25 Jun 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 130/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2025-26)

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 13(1)(b)

12A (1)(ac)(iii) under the new provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are culled out, as under: 2 Dawoodi Bohra Jamaat Committee Anjuman E Ezzi, Takhatpur vs. CIT(E), Bhopal 1. The Ld. CIT(E), Bhopal has erred on facts and, in law in rejecting the application for final registration

SHRI SUDHARM JAIN SEWA SADHNA KENDRA EVAM SIKSHAN SANSTHAN, KANKER,KANKER vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/RPR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Apr 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.118/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2024-25 Shri Sudharm Jain Sewa Sadhna Kendra Evam Sikshan Sansthan Shantipara, Near Bus Stand, Sambalpur, Kanker-494 435 Pan: Aasts6803K

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Golechha, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.L Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

delay of 93 days involved in the present appeal is condoned. 5. The relevant facts are that the assessee had applied in Form 10AB for registration u/s.12AB and 80G(5) of the Act as per the new provisions of the Act. The assessee had made submission in response to the notices issued by the office of the Ld. CIT(Exemption