ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAIPUR vs. MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALAYA, JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Years: 2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vs Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & Cross Objection Nos.09 To 12/Rpr/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019) (Assessment Year :2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vs Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) : Shri Arun Grover & Asheesh Ternain, Cas नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20/04/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am :

charitable institute as claimed by the assessee because if they are incidental, they must not be in such huge form and must not occur year 21 ITA Nos.139-142/RPR/19 & CO Nos.09-12/RPR/19 after year. The reason given by the CIT-II, Jabalpur while refusing the application of the assessee-university was disregarded by the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in its order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAIPUR vs. MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALAYA, JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Years: 2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vs Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & Cross Objection Nos.09 To 12/Rpr/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019) (Assessment Year :2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vs Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) : Shri Arun Grover & Asheesh Ternain, Cas नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20/04/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am :

charitable institute as claimed by the assessee because if they are incidental, they must not be in such huge form and must not occur year 21 ITA Nos.139-142/RPR/19 & CO Nos.09-12/RPR/19 after year. The reason given by the CIT-II, Jabalpur while refusing the application of the assessee-university was disregarded by the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in its order

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAIPUR vs. MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALAYA, JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Years: 2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vs Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) & Cross Objection Nos.09 To 12/Rpr/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.139 To 142/Rpr/2019) (Assessment Year :2009-2010 To 2012-2013) Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vs Acit (Exemption), Raipur Vishwavidyalaya, University Building, Lamti, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur(M.P.) Pan No. :Aaajm 1070 C (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) : Shri Arun Grover & Asheesh Ternain, Cas नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20/04/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am :

charitable institute as claimed by the assessee because if they are incidental, they must not be in such huge form and must not occur year 21 ITA Nos.139-142/RPR/19 & CO Nos.09-12/RPR/19 after year. The reason given by the CIT-II, Jabalpur while refusing the application of the assessee-university was disregarded by the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in its order

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)-1, RAIPUR vs. SHRI CHAITANY MAHAPRABHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 235/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)-1, Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Chaitany Mahaprabhu Shikshan Sansthan 2, Jindal Niwas, Ramsagarpara, Raipur(C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aaits4845F ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal & Smt. Laxmi Sharma, Cas Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 28.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.09.2022

e-filed its return of income for A.Y. 2014-15 on 30.11.2014, declaring a total income of Rs. Nil. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment under Sec.143(2) of the Act. 3. During the course of the assessment proceedings it was, inter alia, observed by the A.O that the assessee had claimed to have received

PAVITRA CRUZ SISTERS ASSOCIATION,AMBIKAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMBIKAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.08/Rpr/2018 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-2015) Pavitra Cruz Sisters Association, Vs Ito, Ambikapur Holy Cross Institute, Manendragarh Road, Ambikapur (C.G.) Pan No. : Aaaap 0283 H (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

E R Per Arun Khodpia, AM : This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A)-I, Raipur, dated 31.10.2017, on the following ground :- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, invoking provisions of Section 11 (4A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on surplus of Rs.2

SINDHU YOUTH ASSOCIATION,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.29/Rpr/2019 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2018-2019) Sindhu Youth Association, Vs Cit(Exemption), Bhopal Sindhu Bhawan, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar, Raipur Pan No. : Aakts 3401 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Smt. Laxmi Sharma & Shri Vimal Agrawal, Cas राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(E), Bhopal, Dated 24.12.2018 For The Assessment Year 2018-2019. 2. The Sole Ground Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Is Against The Action Of The Cit(E) In Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Filed For Exemption U/S.80G Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Society Running Charitable Organization Registered U/S 12A Of The Income Tax Act, Which Was Granted Vide Order Dated 28.03.2008, Mainly Engaged In Charitable Activities For The Welfare Of Society Including Relief Of Poor, Blood Donation & Blood Infusion Camps For Thalassemia Patients & Medical Relief For The Poor, Etc. The Office Of The Society Is Situated At Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). The Assessee Society Had Filed An Application For Exemption U/S 80G Of The Act In Form No. 10G On 07/06/2018. However

section 13(1)(b) and 2(15). 4. Against the rejection of application of the assessee for registration u/s.12AA of the Act by the CIT(E), the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Ld. AR before us submitted his written synopsis which reads as under :- (A) when the CIT has granted registration u/sl2AA after examining the genuineness

THE REDIANT WAY SCHOOL,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE THE CHIF COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

charitable activities however the CCIT has erred in concluding that the objects of the society are not solely for education purpose without taking into cognizance of the fact that the appeallant is an education Institution (and not the society) run by such Society which is exclusively for education purpose. Objects of the society submitted are as under:- The objects

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result ground of the appeal in the instant appeal of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.32&60/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Year:) M/S Disha Education Society, Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Disha Crown, Katchana Road. Exemption, Bhopal Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pan No. :Aaatd5249C : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri V.K.Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 26/04/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/06/2023

2. Material on record Assessee’s reply Herbicure a) Information received i) Name of assessee not Healthcare Bio from CIT(E), Kolkata that mentioned in the statement Herbal Research assessee indulged in of concerned personnel of Foundation bogus transaction and HHBRF. (HHBRF) gave its unaccounted cash ii) Observations of CIT(E) to HHBRF and received that assessee gave its cheque

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result ground of the appeal in the instant appeal of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.32&60/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Year:) M/S Disha Education Society, Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Disha Crown, Katchana Road. Exemption, Bhopal Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pan No. :Aaatd5249C : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri V.K.Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 26/04/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/06/2023

2. Material on record Assessee’s reply Herbicure a) Information received i) Name of assessee not Healthcare Bio from CIT(E), Kolkata that mentioned in the statement Herbal Research assessee indulged in of concerned personnel of Foundation bogus transaction and HHBRF. (HHBRF) gave its unaccounted cash ii) Observations of CIT(E) to HHBRF and received that assessee gave its cheque

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK SANGH,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 15 & 16/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 Shri Jain Shwetamber Murtipujak Sangh C/O. Santosh Parekh, Near Hanuman Mandir, Near Itwari Bazar, Dhamtari, Chhatisgarh-493 773 Pan : Aahas5883K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Ward-1, Raipur (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TURST-REGISTRATION OF- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING OF FORM NO.10B FOR YEARS PRIOR TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 CIRCULAR NO.10[F.NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 22-5-2019 SUPERSEDED BY CIRCULAR NO.28/2019 [F. NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 27-9-2019 AS AMENDED BY CIRCULAR NO.28/2019[F. NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 27-9-2019, CIRCULAR NO.7/2021 [F. NO.197/49/2021-ITA-I], DATED 26-3- 2021 Under

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK SANGH,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, WARD-1, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 15 & 16/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 Shri Jain Shwetamber Murtipujak Sangh C/O. Santosh Parekh, Near Hanuman Mandir, Near Itwari Bazar, Dhamtari, Chhatisgarh-493 773 Pan : Aahas5883K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Ward-1, Raipur (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS TURST-REGISTRATION OF- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING OF FORM NO.10B FOR YEARS PRIOR TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 CIRCULAR NO.10[F.NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 22-5-2019 SUPERSEDED BY CIRCULAR NO.28/2019 [F. NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 27-9-2019 AS AMENDED BY CIRCULAR NO.28/2019[F. NO.197/55/2018-ITA-I], DATED 27-9-2019, CIRCULAR NO.7/2021 [F. NO.197/49/2021-ITA-I], DATED 26-3- 2021 Under

DY. C.I.T.1(2), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S HIRA INDUSTRIES LTD.,, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2010-2011

E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the CIT(A)- Raipur, dated 26.9.2014 for the assessment year 2010-2011. 2. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. Whether in law and facts & circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in restricting the disallowance

DY. C.I.T.1(1), BILASPUR(CG) vs. JSPL,, RAIGARH(C.G)

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

Bench: : Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judical Member Dcit-1(1), Bilaspur- Vs Jspl, 495004 Kharsia Road, Raighagh(Cg) Pan No. : Aabcj 4683 J (Appellant) .. Tsednepser Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Dr Assessee By : Shri Mayank Jain, Ar Date Of Hearing : 12/01/2018 Date Of Pronouncement 15/01/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri N.S.Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Cit(A), Bilaspur, Dated 31.03.2014 For The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. The Sole Grievance Of The Revenue Is That The Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Amount To The Extent Of Rs.2,10,89,707/- Out Of Disallowance Of Rs.3,36,18,098/- Made By The Ao Under The Head Corporate Social Responsibility Expenses. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Domestic Company, A Subsidiary Of Jindal Steel &.Power Limited (Jspl). It Derives Income From Power Generation & Mining. The Company Has Commenced The Commercial Generation Of Thermal Power From Its First Of The Four Units Of 250Mw Each From 08.12.2007. The Assessee Company Filed Its Income Tax Return For The Year Under Consideration Declaring

section 135 the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been made mandatory for companies having net worth of Rs. 500 crores or more OR having turnover of Rs. 1000 crore or more OR having net profit of Rs. 5 crores or more during any financial year, such company has to expend minimum 2% of net profit in CSR activities

SARASWATI SAHITYA PRACHAR SAMITI,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.216/Rpr/2019 निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Year: 2019-20 Sarswati Sahitya Prachar Samiti Vs Cit(Exemptions) 1, Saraswari Vihar Bhopal Rohnipuram, Behind Ayurvedik College, Raipur Chattisgarh - 492 001 Pan No. Aafas 0997J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्धारितीती की ओर से /Assessee By : None राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई ाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/08/2023 घोषणाणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/08/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is Filed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bhopal, Dated 26.09.2019 U/S 10(23C)(Vi) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of The Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1. The Appellant Assessee Is A Aop & Filed The Return Of Its Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 On 22-08-2018 Declaring Total Income At Rs 9,40,500/- The Assessee Filed An Application In Form 56D On Dated 20/10/2018. The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal Has Rejected The Application Filed By The Assessee U/S 10(23C)(Vi) On 26 September. 2019. 2. The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal Issued A Notice On Dated 12/09/2019 For Attending At The Office On 20.09.2019. The Authorized Representative Of The Assessee, Shri Nandan Lai Jain C.A. Appear Before The Ito Of The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal With The Required & Necessary Documents. 3. The Ld. A.O Had Rejected The Impugned Application Without Giving Any Proper & Meaningful Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant.

22-08-2018 declaring Total Income at Rs 9,40,500/- The assessee filed an application in Form 56D on dated 20/10/2018. The CIT (Exemption), Bhopal has rejected the application filed by the assessee u/s 10(23C)(vi) on 26 September. 2019. 2. The CIT (Exemption), Bhopal issued a notice on dated 12/09/2019 for attending at the office

SHRI SHRI MAHESH KUMAR DUHLANI,KORBA(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE , KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaiआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 92/Bil/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shri Mahesh Kumar Duhlani Main Road, P. O. Katoghora, Distt. Korba (C.G) Pan : Aejpd4102K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Mahanadi Complex, Niharika Road, Korba (Cg) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri G. S. Agrawal Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 06.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.06.2022

22 ITR 233 ITAT and CIT vs. Abdul Aziz 72 DTR 216 C.G.. The learned ARY had further submitted that she has mentioned that he runs the shop of boutique and the learned AO has failed to mention the name of the business. 12 A.Y.2011-12 After considering the rival submission I find that Smt. Ekta Jain had filed