SATNA DIOCESAB SOCIETY,SATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION) , RAIPUR
In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed as indicated above
ITA 124/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Nov 2019AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.124/Nag/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri S.R. RaoFor Respondent: ShriG.N. Singh
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 251(2)
section 13(1)(d) of the Act is not called for. We therefore allow the ground No.1 to 6 raised by assessee.
Thus, the ground No.1 to 6 are allowed.
8. The ground No.7 is with respect to enhancement of income.
9. The CIT(A) noticed that the assessee has made a claim of Rs.1,13,65,809/- towards repayment
