BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi489Karnataka430Mumbai426Chennai222Bangalore182Pune96Jaipur88Hyderabad83Kolkata62Surat49Ahmedabad45Lucknow44Chandigarh39Allahabad31Indore30Jodhpur23Visakhapatnam18Calcutta17Amritsar16Cochin15Panaji14Telangana12Agra11Rajkot9SC8Nagpur8Raipur7Cuttack6Kerala5Dehradun3Rajasthan3Patna2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A19Section 1015Section 12A(1)(ac)12Exemption7Section 80G(5)6Section 115Section 80G(5)(iii)4Natural Justice4Limitation/Time-bar

MANAV RACHNA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

ITA 1/RPR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G D Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 01/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Manav Rachana Education Society, A-1, Pushpak Apartments, Opp. Government School, Chhotapara, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Aaaac6228R . ......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Debashish Lahiri, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(vi)

Trust Vs. Chief CIT, 309 ITR 50 (Ori). In its aforesaid order the Hon’ble High Court had observed as under : “Be that as it may, we are here concerned whether in the absence of any statutory provision to condone the delay in presenting the application under section 10(23C)(vi), the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax can exercise

SARASWATI SAHITYA PRACHAR SAMITI,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

4
Section 1542
ITA 216/RPR/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.216/Rpr/2019 निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Year: 2019-20 Sarswati Sahitya Prachar Samiti Vs Cit(Exemptions) 1, Saraswari Vihar Bhopal Rohnipuram, Behind Ayurvedik College, Raipur Chattisgarh - 492 001 Pan No. Aafas 0997J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्धारितीती की ओर से /Assessee By : None राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई ाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/08/2023 घोषणाणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/08/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is Filed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bhopal, Dated 26.09.2019 U/S 10(23C)(Vi) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of The Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1. The Appellant Assessee Is A Aop & Filed The Return Of Its Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 On 22-08-2018 Declaring Total Income At Rs 9,40,500/- The Assessee Filed An Application In Form 56D On Dated 20/10/2018. The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal Has Rejected The Application Filed By The Assessee U/S 10(23C)(Vi) On 26 September. 2019. 2. The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal Issued A Notice On Dated 12/09/2019 For Attending At The Office On 20.09.2019. The Authorized Representative Of The Assessee, Shri Nandan Lai Jain C.A. Appear Before The Ito Of The Cit (Exemption), Bhopal With The Required & Necessary Documents. 3. The Ld. A.O Had Rejected The Impugned Application Without Giving Any Proper & Meaningful Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 10

34,01,195/- 3 iii) The objects of the society is found to be not exclusively for the purpose of education, it has various other social and philanthropic objectives as well. iv) On verification of the documents and audited accounts submitted, it is seen that there is no evidence of the society running any educational institution. Neither any affiliation certificate

SAMARPIT SEVA SANSTHA SUKMA,DHULE vs. ITO, WARD JAGDALPUR, JADALPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 463/RPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Aakash Parakh, Adv. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Saad Kidwai [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable society / institution. The said twin applications by the impugned separate orders were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) on a common and solitary ground that provisional registration was invalid. Aggrieved thereby the assessee came in present separate appeals. ITAT-Raipur Page 2 of 8 Samarpit Seva Sanstha, Sukma Vs CIT(E), Bhopal ITA No. 457 & 463/RPR/2025 4. During

SAMARPIT SEVA SANSTHA SUKMA,DHULE vs. ITO, WARD JAGDALPUR, JAGDALPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 457/RPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Aakash Parakh, Adv. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Saad Kidwai [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable society / institution. The said twin applications by the impugned separate orders were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) on a common and solitary ground that provisional registration was invalid. Aggrieved thereby the assessee came in present separate appeals. ITAT-Raipur Page 2 of 8 Samarpit Seva Sanstha, Sukma Vs CIT(E), Bhopal ITA No. 457 & 463/RPR/2025 4. During

SWARGIYA SHRI MADANLAL JUNEJA JI MEMORIAL NAITRATH SOCEITY, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 484/RPR/2025[NA]Status: HeardITAT Raipur10 Sept 2025

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr SR Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Manisha Kinnu [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable society / institution. The said twin applications by the impugned separate orders were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) on a common and solitary ground that provisional registration was invalid. Aggrieved thereby the assessee came in present separate appeals. ITAT-Raipur Page 2 of 8 Swargiya Shri Madan Lal Juneja Ji Memorial Naitrath Society Vs CIT(E), Bhopal

SWARGIYA SHRI MANDANLAL JUNEJA JI MEMORIAL, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 485/RPR/2025[NA]Status: HeardITAT Raipur10 Sept 2025

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr SR Rao [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Manisha Kinnu [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable society / institution. The said twin applications by the impugned separate orders were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) on a common and solitary ground that provisional registration was invalid. Aggrieved thereby the assessee came in present separate appeals. ITAT-Raipur Page 2 of 8 Swargiya Shri Madan Lal Juneja Ji Memorial Naitrath Society Vs CIT(E), Bhopal

JHAJI SHIKSHAN SAMITI, DURG,DURG vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED

ITA 476/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Year: 2018-19 Jhaiji Shikshan Samiti, Arora Niwas, Ward No. 08, Durg Road, Bemetara, Durg-491335, Chhattisgarh Pan: Aaatj7624B ……….Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Yogesh Sethia [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Manisha Kinnu [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 246ASection 250

charitable institution registered u/s 12A of the Act which filed its return of Income on 27/10/2018. The Audit Report in prescribed Form No. 10B r.w.r. 17B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962[‘IT-Rules’] however was filed on 28/10/2018. The return of Income filed by the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act summarily on 17/10/2019 whereby