BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka269Chennai187Mumbai186Delhi177Bangalore115Hyderabad80Ahmedabad77Pune64Jaipur55Chandigarh40Allahabad33Cochin32Kolkata29Lucknow24Indore16Visakhapatnam15Amritsar11Nagpur10Rajkot10Jodhpur9Cuttack8Raipur7Guwahati7Surat6SC6Agra4Patna4Telangana4Varanasi4Dehradun1Kerala1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1010Exemption6Section 272A(2)(e)5Section 271B5Section 44A5Penalty5Addition to Income5Section 12A4Charitable Trust4Section 271(1)(c)

BETHANY SEVA SANGAM, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) WARD-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 72/RPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.72/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Bethany Seva Sangam C/O. Bethany College Of Nursing, Borsi, Durg (C.G.) Pan : Aaaab0776D .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, (Exemption), Ward-2, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 139Section 147Section 148Section 272ASection 272A(2)(e)

penalty, a sum of Rs. 100/- for every day during which the failure continues." The provisions of section 139(4A) of the Act reads as follows:- "Every person in receipt of income derived from property held under trust or other legal obligation wholly for charitable

2
Section 1482
Section 1392

SHISHU KALYAN SHIKKHA SAMITI, MAHASAMUND,MAHASAMUND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 164/RPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.164/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Shishu Kalyan Shikkha Samiti Panchsheel Nagar, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh-493 445 Pan: Aants0821N ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward, Raipur (C.G) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Mrs. Dimple Warlyani, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 139Section 250(4)Section 272A(2)(e)

charitable trust is located at Mahasamund which is small town where the staff are not conversant with the usage of Income Tax portal as well as emails. This is the reason for which the delay of 6 days occurred in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC. That as evident from Para 4 of the order

VAKRANGEE FOUNDATION, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 196/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.196/Rpr/2023 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vakrangee Foundation Vs Assessing Officer, 103, 1St Floor, Golden Park, Vip Exemption Circle, Estate, Vidhan Sabha Road, Raipur (Cg) Raipur (Cg) Pan: Aaaav8441K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri G.S.Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Satya Parakash Sharma, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 08/09/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/09/2023

For Appellant: Shri G.S.Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Parakash Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 250Section 271Section 271BSection 44A

penalty levied by the learned AO u/s 271B at 2 Rs.1,50,000/- for not getting the audit u/s 44AB, though, the appellant is a Charitable Trust

SRI SAI BABA SANSTHAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION-II, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 541/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.540 & 541/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 Sri Sai Baba Sansthan Sai Mandir, Avenue-B, Civic Center, Sector-6, Bhilai-490 006 (C.G.) Pan: Aadts8938G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Exemption-Ii, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Sethia, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)

charitable activities are also conducted as per the memorandum of association and bye-laws of the said trust. 3. Coming to the merits of the matter, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that these two cases pertains to A.Ys.2012-13 and 2013-14 regarding penalty

SRI SAI BABA SANSTHAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXMP-II, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 540/RPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.540 & 541/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 Sri Sai Baba Sansthan Sai Mandir, Avenue-B, Civic Center, Sector-6, Bhilai-490 006 (C.G.) Pan: Aadts8938G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Exemption-Ii, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Sethia, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)

charitable activities are also conducted as per the memorandum of association and bye-laws of the said trust. 3. Coming to the merits of the matter, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that these two cases pertains to A.Ys.2012-13 and 2013-14 regarding penalty

SHRI SHRI MAHESH KUMAR DUHLANI,KORBA(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE , KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 92/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaiआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 92/Bil/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shri Mahesh Kumar Duhlani Main Road, P. O. Katoghora, Distt. Korba (C.G) Pan : Aejpd4102K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Mahanadi Complex, Niharika Road, Korba (Cg) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri G. S. Agrawal Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 06.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.06.2022

For Appellant: Shri G. S. AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244Section 68

Charitable Trust- ITAT Agra Bench Bhagwandas Sharda [ Deposit of cash on same day may create suspicion but not proved] Umesh Electricals – ITAT Agra [ Deposit of cash on same day in Bank account does not mean that those transactions is not genuine] Based on the above set of arguments and heavily relying upon the decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High

CHHATTISGARH RAJYA OPEN SCHOOL,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's appeal is dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 2/RPR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 02/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Chhattisgarh Rajya Open School Madhyamik Siksha Mandal, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aaagc0179F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption Circle, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.R Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Lahiri, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2

penalty proceedings u/s271(1)(c) is initiated separately. Similar issue was involved in the case of M. P. Rajya Open School vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-1(2), Bhopal in ITA Nos. 193 to 198/Ind/2012 vide order dated 08/11/201 for A.Ys. 2003-04 to 2008-09 in which the issue was decided by the ITAT, Bench-Indore in favour