RANJEET SINGH SAINI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of over aforesaid observations
ITA 58/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Raipur09 Apr 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 58/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)
For Appellant: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250
capital gain on sale of immovable property and the Learned CIT (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi has erred in confirming the same, the addition so made is contrary to facts and law, therefore, it is prayed that the impugned addition of Rs.65,80,000/- may kindly be deleted.
7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned
