BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

47 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80J(4)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai68Bangalore50Raipur47Delhi35Chennai20Kolkata9Ahmedabad8Guwahati8Ranchi6SC5Telangana4Varanasi3Jodhpur3Karnataka3Rajkot3Chandigarh2Indore2Jaipur1Hyderabad1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)54Deduction43Addition to Income30Section 80P(2)(a)23Section 80P(2)18Section 80P(2)(d)15Section 80P9Section 80p(2)(d)8Exemption7

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,GHATULA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 244/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 115/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)

Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3

Disallowance7
Section 2505
Business Income5
Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 114/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SOMNI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 242/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 120/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 121/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 116/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 117/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 119/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

HE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT, SURGI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 246/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

M/S GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 144/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SINGHOLA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 243/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,BALODA BAZAR(C.G0 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 303/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,JOSHILAMATI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER -1,, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 238/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,RAMPUR,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 245/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. TJE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 305/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. 5. Assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. At the very outset

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, PACHEDA, ABHANPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAIPUR

ITA 114/RPR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.114/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Village- Pacheda, Block-Abhanpur, Chhatisgarh-493 661 Pan : Aaaag9886H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 251(2)Section 80P(1)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4), the shares of Zilla the assessee’s claim for Sahakari Bank, a co- deduction of dividend income operative bank. received on shares of Co- operative bank i.e, Zilla Sahakari Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) was liable to be disallowed. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) who not only upheld the aforesaid disallowances

THE GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 104/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the 8 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ( a group of 22 cases) contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order

GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 125/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the 8 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ( a group of 22 cases) contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order

GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 121/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals). However, the CIT(Appeals) not finding favour with the 8 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ( a group of 22 cases) contentions advanced by the assessee upheld the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order