Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi197 Mumbai87 Bangalore50 Jaipur49 Kolkata42 Chennai40 Hyderabad18 Nagpur14 Rajkot12 Pune11 Surat7 Allahabad6 Ahmedabad6 Indore4 Jodhpur4 Agra3 Panaji2 Raipur2 Guwahati1 Cuttack1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153C6 Section 684 Section 143(3)2 Section 132(1)2 Section 139(1)2 Addition to Income2

KUSH KEDIA vs. A.C.I.T. 2(1), RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 105/BIL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur31 Mar 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 105 & 106/Rpr/2015 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2004-05 & 2005-06 Kush Kedia Kedia Bhawan, Mandi Road, Balodabazar.Dist. Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aklpk5127B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1), Raipur. (C.G.) ……""यथ" /Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT D.R

Section 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 68

bogus loans from the aforesaid persons, therefore, the Assessing Officer had rightly assumed jurisdiction and framed the assessment u/s. 143(3) r.w.s.153C of the Act. Rebutting the claim of the assessee that no addition was called for considering the merits of the case, for the reason that the Assessing Officer had observed that the bank accounts of the employees were