Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 143(2)2

SHRI ANAND KISHORE BAGREE,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 4(4), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 151/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri R.B. Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 68

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. No substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal and the stay petition, accordingly, shall stand dismissed." b) The JAIPURITAT in the case of VIVEKAGARWAL[ITA No.292/JP/2017]order dated 06.04.2018 held as under vide Page 9 Para 3: "We hold that the addition made by the AO is merely

SHRI DEVI CHAND JAIN vs. I.T.O. WARD-2, RAJNANDGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 78/BIL/2015[2008-09]Status: Disposed

SHRI ANAND KISHORE BAGREE,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 4(4), RAIPUR

SHRI DEVI CHAND JAIN vs. I.T.O. WARD-2, RAJNANDGAON

SHRI ANAND KISHORE BAGREE,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 4(4), RAIPUR

SHRI DEVI CHAND JAIN vs. I.T.O. WARD-2, RAJNANDGAON

SHRI SHRI DEVI CHAND JAIN,KAWARDHA (C.G.) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, RAJNANDGAON