Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

30 results for “TDS”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai767 Delhi478 Chennai236 Kolkata224 Bangalore156 Ahmedabad135 Jaipur130 Hyderabad120 Indore66 Cochin66 Surat65 Chandigarh62 Pune42 Visakhapatnam34 Lucknow31 Raipur30 Nagpur30 Rajkot29 Guwahati22 Patna19 Agra18 Cuttack17 Amritsar16 Jodhpur13 Allahabad13 Varanasi8 Ranchi7 Jabalpur3 Dehradun3 Telangana2 Panaji2 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 6836 Section 4030 Addition to Income29 Section 143(3)25 TDS22 Disallowance17 Section 143(1)15 Section 143(2)11 Deduction9 Section 144

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR vs. AGRAWAL GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT. LTD., RAIPUR

ITA 331/RPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 331/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 40aSection 68

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 for Rs. 9,06,15,711/- (ii) Addition u/s 40a(ia) for non-deduction of TDS

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2

8

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 93/BIL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

credited sum of TDS in assessment of the previous year in which it was deducted, was detrimental to the small traders who may not be in a position to bear the burden of such disallowance in the present assessment year. 16 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba ITA Nos. 93 & 94 /RPR/2017

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 94/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

credited sum of TDS in assessment of the previous year in which it was deducted, was detrimental to the small traders who may not be in a position to bear the burden of such disallowance in the present assessment year. 16 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba ITA Nos. 93 & 94 /RPR/2017

SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,KORBA vs. DEPUTY COMMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KORBA, KORBA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 148/RPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.148/Rpr/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., Darri Road, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C. Roy, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s.68 of the Act: Rs.14,65,920/-. 6. We have heard the ld. authorized representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record, as well as considered the judicial pronouncements that have been pressed into service by them to drive home their respective contentions. 7. Apropos the disallowance

VALLABH CHANDAK,MAHASAMUND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD MAHASAMUND, MAHASAMUND

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 104/RPR/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur29 Dec 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.104/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Vallabh Chandak Pro. M/S. Laxmi Pharma Purana Mandi Road, Ganjpara, Mahasamund (C.G.)-493 445 Pan : Akhpc3415A .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Ward-Mahasumand (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ananjay Kumar Tiwary, Sr. DR

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 and levying tax thereon as per provisions of section 115BBE(1) of the Act @ 60% by alleging that "assessee had failed to furnish authentic documents such as bank statements of donors or any other documents which can substantiate that there was sufficient cash in the hands of donors at the time of making said gifts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1)), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANJAY JAIN, BHILAI

In the result ground no. 06 of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 55/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: Ita 55/Rpr/2020 (Assessment Years:2014-15) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, V Shri Sanjay Jain, Bhilai S C/O M/S Sidhharth Industries, Plot No. 38, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, C.G. Pan: Aet Pj1859D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ravi Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23-08-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 09-11-2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68

unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the IT act for the failure to substantiate the nature and source of credits? 5. “Whether on points of law and on facts & circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 39,08,200/- made by the AO on account of fictitious loss by establishing exercise

SHRI SHRI MAHESH KUMAR DUHLANI,KORBA(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE , KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 92/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaiआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 92/Bil/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shri Mahesh Kumar Duhlani Main Road, P. O. Katoghora, Distt. Korba (C.G) Pan : Aejpd4102K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Mahanadi Complex, Niharika Road, Korba (Cg) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri G. S. Agrawal Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 06.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.06.2022

For Appellant: Shri G. S. AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244Section 68

unexplained cash credit and added u/s 68 of the Act to the total income of the assessee. B. Shri Ram Niwas Agrawal (HUF): The examination of bank account of Shri ram Niwas Agrawal (HUF) it is found that on 28/03/2011, cash of Rs.3,00,000/- has been deposited in the Savings Bank A/c No.11015576678 of State Bank Of India, Katghora

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1), RAIPUR vs. M/S SUPER IRON AND STEEL PVT LTD.,, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed and Cross objection of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 261/RPR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur31 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.261/Rpr/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Acit-4(1), Raipur Vs M/S Super Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd., Pritpal Farm House, Vip Road, Raipur(C.G.) Pan No. : Aaics 2579 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) & Cross Objection No.13/Rpr/2017 (Arising Out Of Ita No.261/Rpr/2017) ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2010-2011) M/S Super Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit-4(1), Raipur Pritpal Farm House, Vip Road, Raipur(C.G.) Pan No. : Aaics 2579 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

cash credit : 20,00,000/- Disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) : 2,92,028/- Unrecorded contract receipts : 72,435/- Unexplained sundry creditors : 5,49,649/- Interest on late payment of TDS

SUBHASH MURARKA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 176/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.176/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2017-18 Subhash Murarka C-1/85/186-R7, Swarnabhoomi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pan: Aeqpm4578P .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

TDS has been found to be made except for A.Y. 2017-18 Thus the total amount of Rs. 49,32,000/- stands unexplained looking to unproved credit worthiness of the creditors. Therefore, the above amount of Rs. 48,32,000/- Is added back to the total income of the assessee for the year as unexplained Cash

M/S B.B. VERMA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE-I, BILASPUR(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 324/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No. 324/Rpr/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. B.B. Verma Hig-9, C1, C2, Near Niharika Talkies, Korba (C.G) Pan : Aqlps2396C .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By :Shri G.S. Agarwal, Ar Revenue By :Shri Shravankumar Meena, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shravankumar Meena, DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

credit of remaining amount of TDS is to be allowed in its hands on pro-rata basis in the respective years, in which, the same is offered as its income, accordingly direct the AO so. . We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations disposed off the Ground of appeal No.1. 9. We shall now deal with the grievance

SHRI SHRI NISHANT JAIN,BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE-I, BILASPUR(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 199/BIL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.199/Rpr/2016 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Nishant Jain, Vs Jcit, Range-1, Bilaspur(Cg) M/S Landmark Engineer, Flat No.27, Shantinagar, Ring Road No.2, Bilaspur Pan No. : Agepj 9793 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri R.B.Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR

cash system of accounting, then on making payment TDS was to be made as the liability was discharged by making payment. The TDS provisions are applicable both in the situation of actual payment as well of the credit of the amount. It becomes very clear from the fact that the phrase, „on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter

NELSON YONA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 181/RPR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur29 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.181/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2011-12 Nelson Yona Near Shiv Mandir, Avanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G.)-492 006 Pan: Adbpy8725E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 5Section 68

TDS), Raipur (C.G.), TAX Case No.17/2025, dated 24.02.2025, after relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vidya Shankar Jaiswal Vs. ITO, Ward-2, Ambikapur (supra) had held that a justice oriented and liberal approach be adopted while considering the application filed by the assessee for condonation of delay. That in the recent judgment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BHILAI vs. MESERS STEELCO ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED, BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 88/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur31 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.88/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, CIT-DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14A

TDS was deducted at the prescribed rate but the same could not make the transaction sacrosanct. We find that total amount of commission was also drastically increased in the year under reference as compared to the previous year by the assessee company. Such abnormal facts are sufficient for the A.O to reach a conclusion that transactions of commission were

M/S BARBRIK PROJECT LIMITED,SURAJPUR (CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 67/BIL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaiआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 67/Rpr/2017 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri S. R. RaoFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh

Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40

unexplained cash credit. As in this case the capacity of the investor is not proved by the cogent evidence therefore, the cash relied upon is different on facts. The ld. AR also relied up the decision of ITAT Mumbai benches in the case of Dy. CIT Vs. Shubham Motiwala & Jewelers wherein the coordinate bench comprise of the learned Judicial Member

ANSHUKA TANEJA,AASTHA APARTMENT, SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 391/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 391/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Smt. Anshuka Taneja E-7, E-Block, Aastha Apartment, Shankar Nagar, Opposite Wallfort Orchid, Sector-2, Raipur (C.G.)-492 004 Pan: Adupt5936D .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

Section 68Section 69Section 69A

TDS), Raipur (C.G.), TAX Case No.17/2025, dated 24.02.2025 and (iii) Inder Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, Civil Appeal No…………/2025, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6145 of 2024, dated 21st March, 2025. 4. Now coming to the merits of the case as emanating from the assessment order, the addition has been made by the A.O invoking Section

M/S BHILAI JAYPEE CEMENT LIMITED,BHILAI(CG) vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 113/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.113/Rpr/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Bhilai Jaypee Cement Limited 14B, F Pocket, Maroda, Bhilai. Pan : Aadcb1675Q .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Simran Bhullar, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 263

cash system of accounting, in the subsequent year particularly when the hybrid system. of accounting is not permissible u/s 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In 'view of this, the understatement of income to the tune of Rs.42,63,981/- is added back, as evident from Form 26AS. Simultaneously, further credit of TDS of Rs, 5,666/- is also

RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, AMBIKAPUR,SURAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFFICER, WARD-2, AMBIKAPUR, AMBIKARPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 132/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Priyanka Patel, Sr.-DR

Section 142(1)Section 144

TDS), Raipur (C.G.) in Tax Case No.17/2025, dated 24.02.2025, we condone the delay of 479 days. 4. That, regarding merits, the assessment in the case of the assessee was completed u/sec. 144 of the Act and it was a time when e-proceedings had started, a notice u/sec. 142(1) along with questionnaire was served on the assessee through regd

AGRAWAL INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, RAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 11/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.10 & 11/Rpr/2020 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014 & 2014-2015) Agrawal Infrabuild Private Limited, Vs Acit, Central Circle-Ii, Raipur 1St Floor, V.R.Plaza, Bilaspur Pan No. :Aafca 6636 C (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema & Gagan Tiwari, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Debashish Lahiri, CIT-DR

Section 153A(1)Section 68

cash credit U/S 68 of the Act. Thus, addition made by the AO amounting to Rs. 1,55,29,7611- (Rs. 1,55,22,000/- + Rs. 7,7611-) in AY 2013-14 and Rs. 6,40,82,025/- (Rs. 6,40,50,000/- + Rs. 32,025/-) in AY 2014-15 are Confirmed. Therefore, appeal on these grounds is Dismissed

AGRAWAL INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, RAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 10/RPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.10 & 11/Rpr/2020 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014 & 2014-2015) Agrawal Infrabuild Private Limited, Vs Acit, Central Circle-Ii, Raipur 1St Floor, V.R.Plaza, Bilaspur Pan No. :Aafca 6636 C (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema & Gagan Tiwari, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Debashish Lahiri, CIT-DR

Section 153A(1)Section 68

cash credit U/S 68 of the Act. Thus, addition made by the AO amounting to Rs. 1,55,29,7611- (Rs. 1,55,22,000/- + Rs. 7,7611-) in AY 2013-14 and Rs. 6,40,82,025/- (Rs. 6,40,50,000/- + Rs. 32,025/-) in AY 2014-15 are Confirmed. Therefore, appeal on these grounds is Dismissed

SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR,BHILAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIOMER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 54/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur28 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 54/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Shri Sandeep Surendran Nair 38, Income Tax Colony, Gadge Nagar, Hingna Road, Nagpur (M.H.)-440016 Pan : Aczpn2865M .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Makarand M. Joshi &For Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

unexplained cash credit. b- Ultratech Cement (Awarpur Cement) :- There is a difference of Rs. 9,85,367/- in the receipts as per 26AS and as per books. The receipts shown in books of accounts are short. The assessee has been asked to explain the same. The assessee has explained and stated that the Ultratech Cement (Awarpur Cement) has credited