NEELAM MANDHANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 303/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.303/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Neelam Mandhani D-27, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Bgkpm2502A ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Warlyani, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 271ASection 54FSection 69A
4. I have gone through the statement of facts, grounds of appeal, and the facts available on record. Brief facts of the case are that the department as per information available found that the appellant had purchased an immovable property of Rs,2,78,87,860/- and a TDS was deducted of Rs.27,35,500/- on it.
Notice u/s.148
