BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi33Mumbai23Bangalore21Chennai13Lucknow11Jaipur8Indore7Visakhapatnam6Kolkata6Ahmedabad5Hyderabad5Patna3Guwahati2Karnataka2Cochin2Raipur2Surat2Nagpur1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 54F7Section 53A4Section 69A3

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), , RAIPUR vs. SHRI RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL, RAIPUR

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 32/RPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur22 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.32/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. Radheshyam Agrawal 27/B, Ankit Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.). Pan : Aczpa6544J ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Amit M Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 17Section 2(47)(v)Section 49Section 53ASection 54F

54F of Rs. 2,59,08,966/-), as under: 4 DCIT-2(1) Vs. Radheshyam Agrawal On being queried as regards the deduction that was claimed u/s.54F of the Act of Rs.2,59,08,966/-, it was the claim of the assessee that the same was with respect to purchase of a new residential property vide an unregistered purchase agreement

NEELAM MANDHANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 303/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.303/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Neelam Mandhani D-27, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Bgkpm2502A ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Warlyani, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 271ASection 54FSection 69A

54F on the sale of above Land at Indore is baseless because for claiming the exemption one has to file his/her return of income, otherwise the same is not allowable. Therefore, the claim of investment it in the flat with L & T Reality at Navi Mumbai is not acceptable in absence of proper corroborative evidence. Considering the above facts