BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

495 results for “TDS”+ Section 3clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,044Delhi5,957Bangalore2,781Chennai2,466Kolkata1,765Pune1,563Ahmedabad1,256Hyderabad1,058Cochin814Indore758Jaipur722Karnataka646Patna559Chandigarh559Raipur495Nagpur416Visakhapatnam382Cuttack346Surat342Rajkot271Lucknow217Amritsar182Jabalpur151Jodhpur131Ranchi125Dehradun125Agra92Panaji81Guwahati81Telangana80Allahabad67Kerala34Varanasi29Calcutta28SC26Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)95TDS76Addition to Income69Disallowance52Section 25041Natural Justice37Section 143(3)31Deduction28Section 4024Section 80P

DOLPHIN PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS,RAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 58/RPR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 58/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal & Vimal KumarFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 68Section 801B(10)

Section 124(3) of the Act, which as observed by us hereinabove, is in context of the territorial jurisdiction of the A.O. Apart from that, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini Vs. High Court of Delhi (supra), as the Jt. CIT, Range-1, Bilaspur in absence of any order in writing

Showing 1–20 of 495 · Page 1 of 25

...
20
Depreciation17
Penalty16

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-RANGE-1,, BILASPUR vs. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED,, BILASPUR

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 3/BIL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur06 Nov 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm Sl.

For Appellant: S/ShriAjitKorde, S.R. RaoFor Respondent: ShriR.K. Singh
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 220(2)

3(c) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the action of the learned CIT(Appeals) in confirming disallowance upto 25% of the expenditure has no basis whatsoever and the same has been made on an ad-hoc basis. 4. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, no interest under section

JOINT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE -I, BILASPUR(CG) vs. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD, BILASPUR(CG)

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 21/BIL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur06 Nov 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm Sl.

For Appellant: S/ShriAjitKorde, S.R. RaoFor Respondent: ShriR.K. Singh
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 220(2)

3(c) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the action of the learned CIT(Appeals) in confirming disallowance upto 25% of the expenditure has no basis whatsoever and the same has been made on an ad-hoc basis. 4. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, no interest under section

JANTA INDUSTRIES,BASPAIPARA vs. MS.RANJINI SRIKUMAR, INCOMETAX OFFICER(TDS), INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 46/RPR/2026[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.46 & 47/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Janta Industries Durga Talkies Road, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)-491 441 Pan: Aaffj9101J ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Centralized Processing Centre (Cpc) Bengaluru ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: None (written submission)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

3 Janta Industries Vs. ITO (TDS)/CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos. 46 & 47/RPR/2026 6. We have heard the submissions of the Ld. Sr. DR and considered the written submissions filed by the assessee. We find that this issue had come up for adjudication before the Raipur Bench in a series of cases of Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank Vs. Income Tax Officer (TDS

JANTA INDUSTRIES,BASPAIPARA vs. MS.RANJINI SRIKUMAR, INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 47/RPR/2026[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.46 & 47/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Janta Industries Durga Talkies Road, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)-491 441 Pan: Aaffj9101J ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Centralized Processing Centre (Cpc) Bengaluru ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: None (written submission)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

3 Janta Industries Vs. ITO (TDS)/CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos. 46 & 47/RPR/2026 6. We have heard the submissions of the Ld. Sr. DR and considered the written submissions filed by the assessee. We find that this issue had come up for adjudication before the Raipur Bench in a series of cases of Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank Vs. Income Tax Officer (TDS

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 44/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 42/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 45/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS JAGDISH EARTHCON SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS , BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 50/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS JAGDISH EARTHCON SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 51/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL LLP,PATHALGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 40/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL LLP,PATHALGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 41/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS SRISHTI INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 49/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 43/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 47/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 46/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESERS NEERA CONSTRUCTION,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 48/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUSHIL MITTAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 37/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

SHRI SUSHIL MITTAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 38/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section

MESSERS HILL BROW METALLICS & CONSTTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 34/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

3. The brief facts in ITA No. 34/RPR/2019 are that the assessee filed its TDS return late and therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed late filing fee of Rs.1,75,340/- u/s.234E of the Act. 6 Group of cases U/s.234E 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal against the order under the aforesaid section