BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

40 results for “TDS”+ Section 273clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi290Mumbai253Patna150Bangalore115Karnataka107Chennai104Kolkata64Ahmedabad42Raipur40Chandigarh30Indore28Jaipur26Cochin23Hyderabad22Lucknow20Pune13Cuttack13Nagpur12Visakhapatnam11Rajkot7Kerala5Panaji5SC4Allahabad4Agra4Guwahati4Varanasi4Amritsar3Surat2Jodhpur2Orissa1Rajasthan1Telangana1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 206C114TDS40Section 270A3Section 40A(2)(b)2Disallowance2

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 43/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur03 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 43/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495006 Pan: Aadcs2066E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Ajit Korde, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 270ASection 3

TDS credit. 13. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld.CIT(A), NFAC erred in not adjudicating the ground raised for initiating penalty proceedings on account of disallowance relating to amortization of leased land compensation expenses. 14. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC erred in not adjudicating the ground raised for initiating penalty proceedings on account

Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 126/RPR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 123/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 13/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 122/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 14/RPR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 124/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 121/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 125/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BIJAPUR,BIJAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 245/RPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 10/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 158/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 12/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 11/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 120/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 160/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 159/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 161/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 162/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 164/RPR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

273/- which includes interest amounts at Rs.683/-, 206C (1C) on the Appellant to collect tax at source on contribution towards District Mineral Foundation. The appellant neither received amount towards DMF nor it go to State Revenue. Prayed that there was no liability and demand be cancelled. Grounds of Appeal 5. That under the facts and the law, the learned Commissioner