BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

42 results for “TDS”+ Section 271C(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi240Mumbai162Bangalore99Kolkata58Karnataka47Raipur42Jaipur31Cochin28Ahmedabad23Indore15Chandigarh14Jodhpur12Nagpur11Lucknow10Chennai9Hyderabad8Telangana7Visakhapatnam7Surat6Agra5Jabalpur5Panaji5Pune3Ranchi3SC3Dehradun3Orissa2Rajkot2Varanasi1Kerala1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 206C114TDS42Section 20118Section 201(1)12Penalty4Section 270A3Section 2503Deduction3Natural Justice3

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 43/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur03 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 43/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495006 Pan: Aadcs2066E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Ajit Korde, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 270ASection 3

TDS credit. 13. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld.CIT(A), NFAC erred in not adjudicating the ground raised for initiating penalty proceedings on account of disallowance relating to amortization of leased land compensation expenses. 14. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC erred in not adjudicating the ground raised for initiating penalty proceedings on account

Showing 1–20 of 42 · Page 1 of 3

M/S. RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT,BHILAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR

ITA 106/RPR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 105 To 107/Rpr/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 To 2009-10 M/S Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Acc Main Gate, Jamul Square, Jamul, Bhilai.(C.G.)Pan : Ashfr7461F . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Tds, Raipur (C.G.) द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri S. R. Rao Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 22/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 26/12/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am The Present Bunch Of Appeals Is Challenged Against The Consolidated Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Ii, Raipur [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Turned Out Of Consolidated Order Passed U/S 201(1) & 201(1A) Of The Act, By The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Raipur [For Short “Ao”], For Three Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2006-07 To 2008-09. Itat-Raipur Page 1 Of 14

For Appellant: Shri S. R. RaoFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

1) of the Income- tax Act should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer-in-charge of TDS, that taxes due have been paid by the deductee-assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under Section 201 (1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee

M/S. RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT,BHILAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), RAIPUR

ITA 105/RPR/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Dec 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 105 To 107/Rpr/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 To 2009-10 M/S Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Acc Main Gate, Jamul Square, Jamul, Bhilai.(C.G.)Pan : Ashfr7461F . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Tds, Raipur (C.G.) द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri S. R. Rao Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 22/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 26/12/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am The Present Bunch Of Appeals Is Challenged Against The Consolidated Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Ii, Raipur [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Turned Out Of Consolidated Order Passed U/S 201(1) & 201(1A) Of The Act, By The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Raipur [For Short “Ao”], For Three Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2006-07 To 2008-09. Itat-Raipur Page 1 Of 14

For Appellant: Shri S. R. RaoFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

1) of the Income- tax Act should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer-in-charge of TDS, that taxes due have been paid by the deductee-assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under Section 201 (1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee

M/S. RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT,BHILAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR

ITA 107/RPR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 105 To 107/Rpr/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 To 2009-10 M/S Ravi Shree Narayan Transport Acc Main Gate, Jamul Square, Jamul, Bhilai.(C.G.)Pan : Ashfr7461F . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Tds, Raipur (C.G.) द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri S. R. Rao Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 22/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 26/12/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am The Present Bunch Of Appeals Is Challenged Against The Consolidated Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Ii, Raipur [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Turned Out Of Consolidated Order Passed U/S 201(1) & 201(1A) Of The Act, By The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Raipur [For Short “Ao”], For Three Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2006-07 To 2008-09. Itat-Raipur Page 1 Of 14

For Appellant: Shri S. R. RaoFor Respondent: Shri G. N. Singh
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

1) of the Income- tax Act should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer-in-charge of TDS, that taxes due have been paid by the deductee-assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under Section 201 (1A) of the Act till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 125/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 126/RPR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 122/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BIJAPUR,BIJAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 245/RPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 124/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 10/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 11/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 12/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DANTEWADA,DANTEWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 120/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 158/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 161/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, BEMETARA,BEMETARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 14/RPR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 160/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 162/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 163/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MIN & ADMIN), JAGDALPUR,BASTAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 159/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 206C

1) should be enforced after the tax deductor has satisfied the officer- in- charge of TDS That taxes due have been paid by the deductee- assessee. However, this will not alter the liability to charge interest under section 201(1A) till the date of payment of taxes by the deductee-assessee or the liability for penalty under section 271C