BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai272Bangalore128Delhi124Chandigarh89Chennai81Karnataka54Jaipur31Kolkata31Pune31Ahmedabad30Nagpur24Hyderabad23Cochin11Rajkot11Visakhapatnam10Raipur10Telangana8Jabalpur5Cuttack5SC5Kerala4Jodhpur4Lucknow4Panaji4Allahabad3Ranchi3Surat3Amritsar2Indore1J&K1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 234E18Section 200A12Section 4010Section 6810Deduction9TDS8Section 143(3)6Section 249(3)6Limitation/Time-bar6Condonation of Delay

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 231/RPR/2023[2016-17 (First Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

6
Section 14A4
Disallowance4

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 227/RPR/2023[2013-14 (Third Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 228/RPR/2023[2013-14 (Fourth Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 229/RPR/2023[2015-16 (First Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 230/RPR/2023[2015-16 (Second Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

NIKITA KINGRANI, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-TDS WARD, BHILAI, DURG

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed in terms of our observations above

ITA 226/RPR/2023[2013-14 (Second Quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(3)

v. APP. AUTY., SHOPS ACT. In that particular case, the Division Bench of this court has held that, We are of the view that the question of limitation is not merely a technical consideration. Rules of limitation are based on principles of sound policy and principles of equity. Is a litigant liable to have a Damocles' sword hanging over

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1)), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANJAY JAIN, BHILAI

In the result ground no. 06 of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 55/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: Ita 55/Rpr/2020 (Assessment Years:2014-15) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, V Shri Sanjay Jain, Bhilai S C/O M/S Sidhharth Industries, Plot No. 38, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, C.G. Pan: Aet Pj1859D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ravi Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23-08-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 09-11-2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68

V Shri Sanjay Jain, Bhilai s C/o M/s Sidhharth Industries, Plot No. 38, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, C.G. PAN: AET PJ1859D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Ravi Agarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue by : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 23-08-2023 घोषणा

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 93/BIL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

v) Smt. Sharda Devi, Orissa : Rs.10,00,000/-. The CIT(Appeals) was of the view that as the assessee as per “proviso” to Sec. 68 of the Act had failed to discharge the onus that was cast upon him as 5 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba ITA Nos. 93 & 94 /RPR/2017 regards proving

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 94/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

v) Smt. Sharda Devi, Orissa : Rs.10,00,000/-. The CIT(Appeals) was of the view that as the assessee as per “proviso” to Sec. 68 of the Act had failed to discharge the onus that was cast upon him as 5 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba ITA Nos. 93 & 94 /RPR/2017 regards proving

DINESH KUMAR MISHRA, KAWARDHA,KABIRDHAM vs. ITO-1(3), BHILAI, (ERSTWHILE ITO WARD KAWARDHA), BHILAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of over aforesaid observations

ITA 345/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 345/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri Tanjmay Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 194CSection 250

TDS u/s 194C was deducted at Rs.21,92,390/- and u/s 194A for Rs. 9,26,829/-. It is also noticed by the Ld. AO that during the year under consideration, the assessee had deposited cash amounting to Rs. 3 ITA 345/RPR/2025 Dinesh Kumar Mishra vs. ITO-1(3), Bhilai, (Erstwhile ITO Ward Kawardha), Bhilai