DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), , RAIPUR vs. SHRI RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL, RAIPUR
The appeal of the revenue is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations
ITA 32/RPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur22 Sept 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.32/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. Radheshyam Agrawal 27/B, Ankit Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.). Pan : Aczpa6544J ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Amit M Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 17Section 2(47)(v)Section 49Section 53ASection 54F
17 and 49 of the Indian Registration Act,
1908 had also been amended, therein clarifying that unless the document containing the contract to transfer for consideration any immovable property (for the purpose of section 53A of 1882 of the Act) is registered, it shall not have any effect in law other than being
6
DCIT-2(1) Vs. Radheshyam Agrawal
