BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 140A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai69Delhi60Hyderabad25Karnataka23Kolkata8Bangalore7Cochin5Chennai5Ahmedabad3Jaipur2Cuttack2Pune2Raipur2SC2Telangana2Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 1446Section 271(1)(c)6Section 2502Section 1472Section 1512Section 80C2Section 140A2Section 27l2Deduction2Penalty

KUSHAL PRASAD SAHU, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 14/RPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 14 & 15/Rpr/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri G. S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 140ASection 144Section 147Section 151Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 27lSection 80C

140A, kindly be allowed. 4. The Appellant is working as a Guard, and is staff of Indian Railways viz. South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur & due to his nature of employment, he is used to stay outside of his usual residence. The TDS is being made by the employer & because of his unstable place of residence, his Return of Income could

2
TDS2
Condonation of Delay2

KUSHAL PRASAD SAHU, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 15/RPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 14 & 15/Rpr/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri G. S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 140ASection 144Section 147Section 151Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 27lSection 80C

140A, kindly be allowed. 4. The Appellant is working as a Guard, and is staff of Indian Railways viz. South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur & due to his nature of employment, he is used to stay outside of his usual residence. The TDS is being made by the employer & because of his unstable place of residence, his Return of Income could