BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

409 results for “TDS”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,327Delhi5,120Bangalore1,980Chennai1,834Kolkata1,681Ahmedabad1,069Hyderabad946Pune818Jaipur602Chandigarh501Raipur409Indore408Cochin344Cuttack313Surat287Visakhapatnam279Nagpur235Rajkot228Karnataka221Patna199Lucknow161Amritsar139Jabalpur123Ranchi94Jodhpur88Guwahati76Agra74Allahabad60Dehradun55Panaji54Telangana35Varanasi23SC16Calcutta15Kerala10Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6Orissa4Uttarakhand3Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Bombay1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)95Addition to Income81TDS74Disallowance56Section 143(3)32Section 4030Natural Justice30Deduction28Section 25021Section 80P

NISHANT JAIN,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), BILASPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 511/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur20 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 510, 511 & 512/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Nishant Jain Ring Road No.2, Shanti Nagar, Near Sidhasikhar Vistar, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495 001 Pan: Agepj9793M .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

addition of Rs.1,36,15,941 to the income of the appellant on the basis of a difference in turnover as reported in the audit report and Form 26AS, without properly considering the explanations and reconciliations provided by the appellant. The difference in turnover arose due to machinery and mobilization advances received by the appellant, on which the contractee

Showing 1–20 of 409 · Page 1 of 21

...
20
Limitation/Time-bar18
Depreciation18

NISHANT JAIN,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), BILASPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 510/RPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur20 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 510, 511 & 512/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Nishant Jain Ring Road No.2, Shanti Nagar, Near Sidhasikhar Vistar, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495 001 Pan: Agepj9793M .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

addition of Rs.1,36,15,941 to the income of the appellant on the basis of a difference in turnover as reported in the audit report and Form 26AS, without properly considering the explanations and reconciliations provided by the appellant. The difference in turnover arose due to machinery and mobilization advances received by the appellant, on which the contractee

NISHANT JAIN,BILASPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 512/RPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur20 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 510, 511 & 512/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Nishant Jain Ring Road No.2, Shanti Nagar, Near Sidhasikhar Vistar, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495 001 Pan: Agepj9793M .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

addition of Rs.1,36,15,941 to the income of the appellant on the basis of a difference in turnover as reported in the audit report and Form 26AS, without properly considering the explanations and reconciliations provided by the appellant. The difference in turnover arose due to machinery and mobilization advances received by the appellant, on which the contractee

MESSERS HILL BROW METALLICS & CONSTTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 34/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUSHIL MITTAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 37/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL LLP,PATHALGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, , BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 39/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESSERS HILL BROW METALLICS & CONSTTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 35/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUSHIL MITTAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 38/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUSHIL MITTAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 36/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 45/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS JAGDISH EARTHCON SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 51/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 46/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL LLP,PATHALGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 41/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS ARYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 47/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS NEERA CONSTRUCTION,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 48/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS JAGDISH EARTHCON SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS , BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 50/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL LLP,PATHALGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 40/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

MESERS SRISHTI INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 49/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 42/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That

SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, BILASPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 44/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 34 & 35/Rpr/2019 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 234E

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). These cases were heard together and since facts similar, issues common, these appeals are taken up together for adjudication vide this consolidated order. In the grounds of appeal these assessees have contended that prior to 01.06.2015 there cannot be any levy of late fee u/s.234E of the Act. That