BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 5(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,485Mumbai5,302Bangalore2,039Chennai1,139Kolkata973Ahmedabad831Karnataka799Hyderabad788Pune786Jaipur482Surat326Chandigarh317Indore287Cochin245Visakhapatnam144Rajkot140SC125Telangana107Lucknow92Nagpur88Cuttack88Calcutta76Raipur72Amritsar55Jodhpur38Agra38Guwahati38Dehradun37Jabalpur18A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN17Ranchi15Panaji13Varanasi13Kerala13Rajasthan13Allahabad12Patna11Orissa9Punjab & Haryana3Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1S.B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1

Key Topics

Section 1432Section 112Penalty2

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GURGAON vs. M/S EQUANT SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD

Appeals stand disposed of in the above terms

ITA/419/2016HC Punjab & Haryana30 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 19 CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the 'Act') on 9th January, 2014 accepting TNMM as the most appropriate method, however, the Transfer Pricing Officer chose certain comparables for IT services and ITES services with a mean “OP/TC” of 25.17 of IT services and 30.45% for IT enabled services and proposed transfer pricing adjustments

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar (for short, ‘the CIT’) vide its order dated 24.10.2013 exercised powers under Section 12AA (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) and cancelled the registration granted to the assessee-society under Section 12A of the Act holding that it was not working for the objects for which

CIT-I CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PB.INFO&COMM. TECH. CORP. LTD. CHD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/398/2009HC Punjab & Haryana18 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 271

5. As against the above, learned counsel for the respondent- assessee submitted that the impugned order called for no interference. The CIT (A) while exercising powers of revision had taken the view that the assessee had rightly followed the project completion method. This view could not be treated as erroneous or pre-judicial to the interest of revenue. He further