BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 271(1)(C)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,367Mumbai1,137Bangalore290Karnataka245Ahmedabad201Pune175Jaipur167Kolkata128Chennai127Hyderabad96Indore78Chandigarh56Calcutta51Surat50Raipur32Visakhapatnam29Lucknow28Rajkot23Nagpur23Guwahati16Cochin16Cuttack10SC8Telangana8Agra5Panaji5Rajasthan4Jodhpur3Punjab & Haryana3Amritsar3Allahabad3Dehradun3Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2713Section 2633Section 92C3Penalty3Section 1432Section 112

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

transferring 1.65 acres of land from Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana to PIMS-Society, Jalandhar. The Governing Council was formed headed by Chief Minister. A Director was appointed by the State Government. The society was registered in 1994. The State Government granted a sum of ` 3 crores in the year 1994-95. In 1996, an Architect was appointed to prepare master

MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/152/2023HC Punjab & Haryana18 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 120
Section 140
Section 144
Section 263
Section 271
Section 92C

271(E). He takes this Court to the explanation appended to Section 263 explanation-1, to submit that, the instant mention in explanation (A) would be only in the cases where the Pr.CIT would be empowered to review the orders of the CIT. He submits that in this case, the appellant is not falling under Section

CIT-I CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PB.INFO&COMM. TECH. CORP. LTD. CHD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/398/2009HC Punjab & Haryana18 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 271

271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') were ordered to be initiated separately against it. 3. Feeling aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 20.12.2005, the respondent-assessee had filed appeal under Section 143 (3) of the Act before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh (for short “CIT (A)”) who vide order dated