BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 13(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7,745Mumbai6,430Bangalore2,073Kolkata1,632Chennai1,496Ahmedabad1,402Jaipur1,178Hyderabad1,076Pune868Karnataka745Surat695Chandigarh670Indore645Cochin385Raipur377Visakhapatnam319Rajkot310Nagpur206Amritsar196Cuttack189Agra180Lucknow175Guwahati143Telangana141Ranchi103SC100Jodhpur98Allahabad85Jabalpur82Calcutta78Patna76Dehradun60Panaji44Varanasi26Rajasthan17Orissa12Kerala12A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati3Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. JOGINDER SINGH CHATHA

ITA/25/2023HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 260A

13,83,849/- @ `44.61 per US$ in the said bank account during the financial year 2005-2006 and relevant to the assessment year 2006-2007. Similarly, there was another deposit of $226509.38 equivalent to `1,00,04,919/- @ of `44.17 per US$ in the year financial year 2006-2007 NAVEEN NAGPAL 2023.11.15 12:21 I attest to the accuracy

RANJIT SINGH GHUMAN vs. C I T

ITA/216/2007HC Punjab & Haryana17 May 2024

Bench: The Revenue Authorities That A Sum Of ` 5,00,000/- Was Still Due To Be Paid & Varinder Singh 2024.05.21 13:43 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

Section 158

Section 158 BC (c) on 26.02.2002 by the CIT, Jalandhar and while making other VARINDER SINGH 2024.05.21 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment ITA No. 216 of 2007 -3- additions, ` 5,00,000/- have been added as undisclosed investment made to acquire the rights of his sister-in-law in the family property