BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 13(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,098Mumbai5,033Bangalore1,805Kolkata1,314Chennai1,142Ahmedabad1,100Jaipur1,055Hyderabad942Karnataka725Pune682Chandigarh592Surat516Indore350Raipur285Cochin238Visakhapatnam215Rajkot212Lucknow153Agra152Amritsar144Nagpur142Cuttack137Guwahati119Telangana118SC88Jabalpur77Calcutta75Ranchi67Jodhpur61Allahabad58Patna56Dehradun41Panaji40Varanasi23Orissa13Rajasthan12Kerala11Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Uttarakhand3Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. JOGINDER SINGH CHATHA

ITA/25/2023HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 260A

13,83,849/- @ `44.61 per US$ in the said bank account during the financial year 2005-2006 and relevant to the assessment year 2006-2007. Similarly, there was another deposit of $226509.38 equivalent to `1,00,04,919/- @ of `44.17 per US$ in the year financial year 2006-2007 NAVEEN NAGPAL 2023.11.15 12:21 I attest to the accuracy

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH vs. M/S VISHAV MANAV RUHANI KENDRA

ITA/133/2021HC Punjab & Haryana20 Oct 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 11(1)(d)Section 260A

B’ passed in ITA No.899/Chd/2019 dated 21.05.2020 (Annexure A-3). 2. Counsel for the appellant has pressed the following substantial question of law:- “(ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the action of the authorities below is right in the law in allowing the appeal of the assessee by ignoring the fact that the donations