BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10,322Mumbai9,221Kolkata3,067Bangalore2,334Ahmedabad2,095Chennai2,019Jaipur1,538Hyderabad1,355Pune1,134Surat954Indore823Chandigarh771Karnataka692Rajkot461Cochin418Visakhapatnam410Raipur372Lucknow304Nagpur279Amritsar261Agra238Guwahati226Cuttack205Calcutta159Patna150Ranchi147Telangana147Jodhpur137Jabalpur115Dehradun104Allahabad103Panaji72SC67Varanasi48Rajasthan19Orissa13Kerala10Punjab & Haryana5Uttarakhand4Gauhati3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Tripura1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5Section 683Section 41(1)2

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURGAON vs. M/S DHG MARKETING PVT.LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/56/2019HC Punjab & Haryana15 May 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 132Section 132ASection 143(2)Section 147Section 153Section 153ASection 260Section 68

addition amounting to Rs.4.15 crores, under Section 68 of the Act on account of unexplained credits relating to share capital received by the assessee during the relevant period. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income

OM PARKASH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 AAYAKAR BHAWAN JALANDHAR

ITA/338/2019HC Punjab & Haryana30 Mar 2022

Bench: MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA,MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Section 133(6)Section 145(3)Section 41(1)Section 41(1)(a)Section 44A

68,859,00 Cr. Total 4,60,581.00 Cr. 5. In the absence of any confirmation from the above parties, it was held that the trading liability amounting to Rs.4,60,581/- had ceased to exist as per provisions of Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and addition

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. JOGINDER SINGH CHATHA

ITA/25/2023HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 260A

addition made by the relevant Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax was deleted while allowing the appeals. 3. The substantial questions of law of which are sought to be determined by the revenue read as under:- “(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MS GOBIND DHAM RENEWABLE ENERGY PVT LTD

ITA/111/2024HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: The Revenue Authorities Related To Source Of Source. In Our Considered View The Assessee Submitted Pan, Returns Of Income, Audited Financial Statements, Transactions Through Banking Channels. The Ld. Ar Invited Our Attention To The Jawala Ram 2024.12.10 17:53 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authenticity Of This Document

Section 68

additions under Section 68, for undisclosed credit, the concerned assessee has to satisfy the identity of the party to the banking transactions, filing of the Income

RANJIT SINGH GHUMAN vs. C I T

ITA/216/2007HC Punjab & Haryana17 May 2024

Bench: The Revenue Authorities That A Sum Of ` 5,00,000/- Was Still Due To Be Paid & Varinder Singh 2024.05.21 13:43 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

Section 158

Section 158 BC (c) on 26.02.2002 by the CIT, Jalandhar and while making other VARINDER SINGH 2024.05.21 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment ITA No. 216 of 2007 -3- additions, ` 5,00,000/- have been added as undisclosed investment made to acquire the rights of his sister-in-law in the family property. Total