BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 8clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,872Mumbai5,154Chennai1,656Bangalore1,422Kolkata1,270Ahmedabad854Hyderabad660Jaipur611Raipur443Pune440Chandigarh366Indore277Karnataka269Rajkot224Surat205Amritsar184Cochin183Visakhapatnam156Patna151Nagpur127Lucknow109Agra100Guwahati100Telangana96Cuttack93Dehradun78Ranchi76Jodhpur70SC45Allahabad45Calcutta31Panaji29Orissa15Jabalpur12Kerala11Rajasthan10Varanasi9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 1476Section 153A4Section 1393Section 1433Section 1483Section 803Section 260A2Section 10(29)2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GURGAON vs. M/S BHARATNET TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

Appeals stands dismissed in limine

ITA/100/2019HC Punjab & Haryana06 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 153ASection 260A

reassess the total income for the entire six years block assessment period even in case of completed/unabated assessment. As per the second proviso to Section 153A, only pending assessment/reassessment shall stand abated and the AO would assume the jurisdiction with respect to such abated assessments. It does not provide that all completed/unabated assessments shall abate. If the submission on behalf

HRY WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF IT

ITA/526/2005HC Punjab & Haryana20 Nov 2025

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 10(29)
Section 139
Section 143
Section 143(3)
Section 147
Section 148
Section 260A

8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their able assistance. 9. From the perusal of record, it is evident that appellant filed PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.11.26 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-526-2005 and ITA-527-2005 -4- returns up to assessment year 1991-1992 disclosing

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SWARAJ ENGINES LTD MOHALI

ITA/266/2016HC Punjab & Haryana03 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

section 147, however, remain the same." For the afore-stated reasons, we see no merit in these civil appeals filed by the Department, hence, dismissed with no order as to costs.” 8. The contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the phrase 'conceptual difference' between power to review and power to reassess