BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 6clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,209Mumbai5,705Chennai1,809Bangalore1,473Kolkata1,415Ahmedabad956Hyderabad677Jaipur677Pune466Raipur449Chandigarh385Indore313Karnataka286Rajkot250Surat227Cochin191Amritsar188Patna160Visakhapatnam156Nagpur133Agra122Cuttack117Lucknow116Guwahati108Telangana99Ranchi94Dehradun84Jodhpur76SC47Allahabad47Calcutta35Panaji33Orissa16Kerala16Jabalpur15Rajasthan12Varanasi9Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 1484Section 153A4Section 1393Section 1433Section 143(3)3Section 803Section 260A2Addition to Income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GURGAON vs. M/S BHARATNET TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

Appeals stands dismissed in limine

ITA/100/2019HC Punjab & Haryana06 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 153ASection 260A

6 years for the period/block assessment period until any incriminating material was found. The intention could not be given to reopen the completed unabated assessment. The relevant portion reads as under: “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of a search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. M/S SUPERTECH FORGINGS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/101/2022HC Punjab & Haryana05 Sept 2023

MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

2
Bench:
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 143(3) of the Act. 6. An FIR had been registered against Madan Lal Pahuja on 13.09.2009. On 13.02.2023, learned counsel for the appellant sought time to get instructions whether any steps were taken with respect to the business transaction with bogus bills of Madan Lal Pahuja, who had been acquitted in the criminal trial. Today, learned counsel

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SWARAJ ENGINES LTD MOHALI

ITA/266/2016HC Punjab & Haryana03 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

reassess such income and also any other income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, or recompute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections

HRY WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF IT

ITA/526/2005HC Punjab & Haryana20 Nov 2025

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 10(29)Section 139Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260A

6. Learned counsel representing the appellant submits that appellant filed returns for the assessment year 1987-1988 and 1988-1989. The returns were filed under Section 139 and processed under Section PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.11.26 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-526-2005 and ITA-527-2005 -3- 143 of 1961 Act. The respondent