BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 12(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,635Mumbai3,937Chennai1,334Bangalore1,219Kolkata807Ahmedabad646Hyderabad614Jaipur570Raipur413Pune326Chandigarh310Rajkot208Indore188Surat170Amritsar165Visakhapatnam128Cochin128Patna122Nagpur115Lucknow90Agra88Guwahati84Cuttack81Ranchi62Jodhpur61Dehradun51SC42Karnataka40Allahabad36Panaji27Telangana20Calcutta17Orissa13Kerala13Rajasthan11Jabalpur5Varanasi5Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 1473Section 260A2Section 1392Section 10(29)2Section 1432Section 1482Section 143(3)2Addition to Income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GURGAON vs. M/S BHARATNET TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

Appeals stands dismissed in limine

ITA/100/2019HC Punjab & Haryana06 Nov 2023

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN

Section 153ASection 260A

2) of Section 153A, if any proceeding initiated or any order of assessment or reassessment made under sub-section (1) has been annulled in appeal or any other legal proceeding, then, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or section 153, the assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to sub-section

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. M/S SUPERTECH FORGINGS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/101/2022HC Punjab & Haryana
2
05 Sept 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Reassessment proceedings were initiated under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent-assessee had made bogus purchases of Rs.4.26 crores by inflating the expenses and thereby suppressed the profits by Rs.4.26 crores for the AY 2010-2011. 4. The bogus purchases were reflected by the statements of Sh. Madan Lal Pahuja and Jatinder Kumar before the Investigating

HRY WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF IT

ITA/526/2005HC Punjab & Haryana20 Nov 2025

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 10(29)Section 139Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260A

2. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act) is seeking setting aside of PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.11.26 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-526-2005 and ITA-527-2005 -2- order dated 17.05.2005 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short ‘ITAT