BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,420Delhi2,151Chennai1,007Bangalore781Kolkata550Ahmedabad368Jaipur365Hyderabad291Pune185Chandigarh176Raipur130Indore119Surat104Amritsar97Rajkot70Lucknow68Nagpur65Cochin61Guwahati57Visakhapatnam54Agra51Jodhpur45Patna42Cuttack41Allahabad35Ranchi31Karnataka21SC13Dehradun12Panaji11Kerala9Calcutta7Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Telangana4Gauhati2Varanasi2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 14713Section 1410Section 143(3)6Section 1485Section 803Section 1542Section 1432Reassessment2Depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. M/S SUPERTECH FORGINGS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/101/2022HC Punjab & Haryana05 Sept 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Reassessment proceedings were initiated under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The respondent-assessee had made bogus purchases of Rs.4.26 crores by inflating the expenses and thereby suppressed the profits by Rs.4.26 crores for the AY 2010-2011. 4. The bogus purchases were reflected by the statements of Sh. Madan Lal Pahuja and Jatinder Kumar before the Investigating

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SWARAJ ENGINES LTD MOHALI

ITA/266/2016HC Punjab & Haryana03 Feb 2020

MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

2
Bench:
Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

disallowed. Thereafter notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee claiming that the benefit of Section 80-I of the Act had wrongly been extended. Ultimately the Tribunal set aside this order holding that the primary condition of Section 147 of the Act viz 'reason to believe' (as defined by a plethora of judgments

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I LUDHIANA vs. M/S VERDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. LUDHIANA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/315/2011HC Punjab & Haryana24 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 260ASection 32

reassessment proceedings, the reasons recorded for reopening were served upon the assessee. Vide letter dated 22.01.2010, the assessee raised objection alleging it to be a review of the earlier decision of the Assessing Officer. The second objection of the assessee was that there was no foundation for forming the belief and in the absence of such reasons, the Assessing Officer

C I T vs. M/S PUNAJB STATE WAREHOUSING CORP.

Appeal is allowed, impugned order dated

ITA/843/2008HC Punjab & Haryana02 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154

disallow such expenditure. The object and purpose of POOJA SAINI 2023.02.28 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment ITA-843-2008 (O&M) -2- the proviso is to ensure that the retrospective amendment is not made as a weapon to reopen past settled cases which have attained finality. In the above said judgments

C I T vs. M/S PUNAJB STATE WAREHOUSING CORP.

Appeal is allowed, impugned order dated

ITA/846/2008HC Punjab & Haryana02 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154

disallow such expenditure. The object and purpose of POOJA SAINI 2023.02.28 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment ITA-846-2008 (O&M) -2- the proviso is to ensure that the retrospective amendment is not made as a weapon to reopen past settled cases which have attained finality. In the above said judgments