BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 92(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi938Mumbai819Ahmedabad239Jaipur214Bangalore193Karnataka125Kolkata112Raipur99Chennai95Pune93Indore75Chandigarh58Hyderabad55Visakhapatnam38Surat35Calcutta34Amritsar34Rajkot33Nagpur29Guwahati28Lucknow25Allahabad23Cochin20Agra11Jabalpur9Patna5Cuttack5Panaji4Jodhpur3Dehradun3Varanasi3Rajasthan3Punjab & Haryana2SC2Telangana2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S PIYUSH COLONIZERS LTD.

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/300/2019HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act disregarding the facts that the penalty is leviable on contravention of the provisions of a civil statute like Income Tax Act, there being so many judgments that breach of a civil obligation attracts levy of penalty whether the contravention was made by the defaulters with any guilty intentions

M/S.ESCORTS EMPLOYEES ANCILLAR vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA

ITR/167/1999HC Punjab & Haryana15 Nov 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

92,325/- on account of non- genuine sales was already included in the addition of Rs.9,75,333/- made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal, therefore, rightly deleted this addition. As regards the benefit of past savings of Rs.4 lacs granted to the appellant, the Assessing Officer himself held that jewellery belongs to the appellant and was, therefore, required