BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,742Delhi4,586Bangalore1,694Chennai1,393Kolkata891Karnataka831Jaipur674Hyderabad628Ahmedabad601Pune471Chandigarh357Surat327Indore235Telangana221Cochin199Rajkot146Amritsar141Visakhapatnam136Lucknow120Nagpur116Raipur116SC85Calcutta79Patna73Cuttack72Agra67Jodhpur42Guwahati38Dehradun25Varanasi25Rajasthan24Allahabad22Kerala22Jabalpur20Ranchi10Panaji10Orissa9Punjab & Haryana6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1J&K1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 1583House Property3Addition to Income3Exemption3Section 262Section 112Section 54F2Section 11(1)(a)

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes during the previous year in which such services are so provided and shall be chargeable to income- tax notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 11. Explanation. For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "value" shall be the value of any benefit or facility granted

M/S Y.S. AND CO-OWNERS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ETC.

ITA/20/2008HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 144Section 167B(2)(i)
2
Deduction2
Undisclosed Income2
Section 2
Section 26

Section 2 the purpose of assessment of property? The back drop of this appeal is hased property in their names ha and thereafter constructed godow SUP and Punjab Ware Housing

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU

ITA/525/2006HC Punjab & Haryana25 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 132Section 142Section 158Section 260

2 investment in purchase of properties, uncorroborated gift from Sh. Arvinder Pal Singh; undisclosed notional income from house property; unexplained household expenses and unexplained credits in Bank A/cs etc. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order of Assessing Officer, the respondent preferred an appeal before the CIT (A)-I, Ludhiana, who vide its order dated 03.03.2003 partly allowed the appeal filed

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)Section 263

properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income Nil Unapplied fixed assets expenditure during the year : 42,94,59,527.56” 3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order on the premise as under:- “On perusal of records as well

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 54F

2. We fin order p Kishore &M) discussed in detail in the earlie find that in the peculiar facts claim of the assessee has to b the amendment by the Financ 54F comes into effect only fro the said date the benefit of ded for investments made outside I denied as it can be said to be li residential house

RANJIT SINGH GHUMAN vs. C I T

ITA/216/2007HC Punjab & Haryana17 May 2024

Bench: The Revenue Authorities That A Sum Of ` 5,00,000/- Was Still Due To Be Paid & Varinder Singh 2024.05.21 13:43 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

Section 158

2,05,000/-, ` 45,000/-, ` 80,000/-, ` 1,00,000/- and ` 70,000/- in various years from 2003 to 2006. Copies of the bank statements have been also placed in order to confirm the submissions made by the appellant with regard to the fact that the amount of ` 5,00,000/- was still due to be paid and the Income