Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,500 Delhi5,077 Bangalore1,947 Chennai1,728 Kolkata1,016 Karnataka867 Hyderabad726 Jaipur679 Ahmedabad630 Pune560 Chandigarh397 Surat317 Indore255 Telangana240 Cochin233 Visakhapatnam166 Amritsar152 Rajkot144 Nagpur133 Raipur125 Lucknow117 SC88 Patna87 Cuttack84 Calcutta80 Agra78 Jodhpur50 Guwahati39 Dehradun32 Varanasi26 Rajasthan24 Jabalpur23 Kerala22 Allahabad20 Ranchi16 Panaji16 Orissa9 Punjab & Haryana6 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 Gauhati2 Himachal Pradesh2 Andhra Pradesh2 J&K1 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 ANIL R. DAVE L. NAGESWARA RAO1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 2634 Section 1583 House Property3 Addition to Income3 Exemption3 Section 262 Section 112 Section 54F2 Section 11(1)(a)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU

ITA/525/2006HC Punjab & Haryana25 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 132Section 142Section 158Section 260

properties, uncorroborated gift from Sh. Arvinder Pal Singh; undisclosed notional income from house property; unexplained household expenses

M/S Y.S. AND CO-OWNERS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ETC.

ITA/20/2008HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

2

Undisclosed Income2

Section 167B(2)(i)

Section 2

Section 26

property in their names ha and thereafter constructed godow SUP and Punjab Ware Housing from these agencies were

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

house property m However, prior to the said d kicks in, there is no statutory make investments outside

RANJIT SINGH GHUMAN vs. C I T

ITA/216/2007HC Punjab & Haryana17 May 2024

Bench: The Revenue Authorities That A Sum Of ` 5,00,000/- Was Still Due To Be Paid & Varinder Singh 2024.05.21 13:43 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

property i.e. House No.537, Model Town, Jalandhar. As a result of the said family settlement, the land was valued

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes during the previous year in which such services are so provided and shall be chargeable to income- tax notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 11. Explanation. For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "value" shall be the value of any benefit or facility granted

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)Section 263

properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income Nil Unapplied fixed assets expenditure during the year : 42,94,59,527.56” 3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order on the premise as under:- “On perusal of records as well