BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 92clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,050Delhi3,048Bangalore1,203Chennai903Kolkata853Ahmedabad564Hyderabad357Jaipur331Chandigarh239Pune239Indore231Surat164Rajkot127Visakhapatnam112Cochin81Raipur74Amritsar72Lucknow62Guwahati59Cuttack57Nagpur50Karnataka48Calcutta42Allahabad42Patna24SC24Telangana21Ranchi21Dehradun19Panaji19Jodhpur18Agra14Varanasi10Kerala9Jabalpur7Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan3MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Section 1544Deduction3Section 1432Section 260A2Section 802Disallowance2Addition to Income2

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

disallowing the expenditure of Rs.7,92,058/- for the assessment year 2000-01 are arbitrary, unreasonable and perverse?" Hon'ble Calcutta High Court partly allowed the appeal of the assessee and observed as under:- ITA Nos. 244, 281, 282, 283 & 630 of 2005 2023:PHHC:056092-DB 8 “In the Act itself the word business expenditure' has not been defined

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S PIYUSH COLONIZERS LTD.

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/300/2019HC Punjab & Haryana
10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)

disallowance of `7,70,72,993/- and addition was restricted to `1,85,92,817/-. For the addition sustained, penalty proceedings were initiated under Section

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA vs. M/S VENUS REMEDIES LIMITED

ITA/10/2024HC Punjab & Haryana02 Aug 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 115JSection 143Section 154

disallowing the 1961. It is submitted that the 1, are limited and the assessee correction in the original return ducted in the books of account Learned counsel submits that he Karnataka High Court was y dismissal of the LPA of the application U/s 154 of the Act, law as taken by the Karnataka

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LTD.(NOW GLAXO SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD.)

Appeal stands disposed of

ITA/269/2009HC Punjab & Haryana19 Jan 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260ASection 80

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is seeking setting aside of order dated 31.01.2025 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh. 2. The appellant has raised following questions for adjudication by this Court:- (i) Whether on facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is right in law in permitting the change in method of accounting