Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 88clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,909 Delhi3,133 Chennai1,107 Bangalore1,041 Kolkata935 Ahmedabad543 Hyderabad409 Jaipur351 Indore260 Pune247 Surat230 Chandigarh226 Nagpur133 Raipur124 Cochin118 Amritsar114 Visakhapatnam107 Rajkot105 Agra97 Lucknow96 Cuttack91 Guwahati62 Allahabad53 Calcutta49 Karnataka47 Patna45 Panaji43 Ranchi39 Telangana37 Jodhpur27 SC17 Dehradun15 Jabalpur8 Varanasi5 Rajasthan3 Kerala3 Punjab & Haryana3 Himachal Pradesh2 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 Gauhati1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Uttarakhand1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 35D5 Deduction3 Section 372 Section 43(1)2 Section 37(1)2 TDS2 Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MUKERIAN PAPERS LTD

ITA/408/2006HC Punjab & Haryana14 Nov 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 35DSection 37Section 37(1)Section 43(1)

88,825/- was allowed under the provisions of section 35D of the Act and the balance amount of Rs.70,99,425/- was disallowed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 80

Section 143 (2) of the Act as well as the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer. On the other hand, the AJAY PRASHER 2023.04.10 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA No.140 of 2013 (O&M) -4- appeal filed by the revenue-department was dismissed. Hence, the present appeal. Vide order dated 25.03.2014 passed

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

88,79,150/- for the assessment year 1996-97 on 28.11.1996 and the same was processed under Section 143 (1) (a) of Act 1961, vide order dated 21.03.1997. The appellant-Company engaged in the business of manufacturing of cycles. During the relevant assessment year (96-97), the appellant-company claimed deduction on account of travelling expenditure incurred on the director