BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 50clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,733Delhi6,415Chennai2,030Bangalore1,970Kolkata1,799Ahmedabad1,004Hyderabad692Jaipur656Pune600Indore441Surat383Chandigarh375Raipur314Rajkot257Nagpur207Cochin201Visakhapatnam167Lucknow156Amritsar154Karnataka150Cuttack81Allahabad76Jodhpur66Telangana65Guwahati65Patna59Calcutta59SC55Ranchi52Agra47Panaji45Dehradun34Varanasi24Kerala19Jabalpur10Punjab & Haryana7Himachal Pradesh3Orissa3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Bombay1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Addition to Income6Section 271(1)(c)5Penalty3Disallowance3Section 1432Section 2712Section 260A2Deduction2

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

disallowed the e amount for inv ground that pur purpose of tradin 6. The Commissioner o 05.10.2004 allo order dated 17.0 1999-2000 and 05.10.2004 and who vide its ord 7. Hen SUBMISSIONS 8. Lea appellant to car amendment in th their meeting da stock-in-trade an learned Assessin the appellant ha (O&M) and other connected ca sessing

BHARTI BHUSHAN JINDAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

ITA/385/2014HC Punjab & Haryana03 Jul 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 271
Section 36(1)(vii)
Section 36(2)
Section 41(1)
Section 56
Section 57

50,000/- on 10.08.2005. Subsequently, notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) dated 03.08.2006 along with detailed questionnaire were issued and served upon the appellant on 07.08.2006. Appellant filed its reply dated 28.11.2006. After considering the reply, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-I, Ludhiana, vide order dated 29.12.2006, disallowed

CIT-I CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PB.INFO&COMM. TECH. CORP. LTD. CHD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/398/2009HC Punjab & Haryana18 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 271

Section 145 of the Act, unless he comes to a conclusion that notified accounting standards had not been regularly followed by such assessee. As such, the assessee could not be compelled to adopt completion method for one particular year on selective basis as in our considered opinion, that would certainly amount to distorting the computation of the true profits

M/S INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD., RAJP vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA & OR

ITA/129/2000HC Punjab & Haryana20 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh in ITA No.487/Chandi/1992 for the assessment year 1990-1991 disallowing the credit of Rs.89,854/- to the sister concerns on the specific ground that the advances given to the sisters concerns were not proved to be relating

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

50’s was near About Rs.7-8 per Kg. Therefore, the Cost of PVC wire was about Rs.15- TRIPTI SAINI 2024.03.22 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2024:PHHC:041731-DB ITR-3-2010 (O&M) -6- 16 per Kg. i.e. 5-6 yards. On a liberal Estimate the value is taken at Rs.20

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S PIYUSH COLONIZERS LTD.

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/300/2019HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)

50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court,Chandigarh ITA No. 300 of 2019 [3] dated 29.12.2009 by disallowing claim of indirect expenses thereby making an addition of `9,56,65,810/-. In appeal, the 1st Appellate Authority quashed the disallowance of `7,70,72,993/- and addition was restricted

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144Section 80

Section 144 of the Income Tax Act was completed on 24.12.2008 by making the following additions:- “(1) During the assessment proceedings, the identity and creditworthiness of the parties subscribed share capital remained unproved and the genuineness of the transaction was also unproved, therefore, the capital of Rs.55,00,000/- was treated as income from undisclosed sources of the assessee