BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 45(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,293Delhi4,707Bangalore1,714Chennai1,476Kolkata1,254Ahmedabad715Jaipur507Hyderabad487Indore355Pune307Chandigarh224Surat204Raipur186Rajkot175Karnataka152Cochin141Visakhapatnam139Nagpur139Lucknow104Amritsar104Cuttack86Allahabad63Guwahati53Calcutta46Ranchi46Jodhpur42SC39Telangana36Patna36Dehradun23Kerala18Agra17Jabalpur11Varanasi9Panaji6Orissa4Punjab & Haryana4Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1Bombay1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 35D5Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 43(1)2Section 37(1)2

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

45 49,955 Terry wool 70:30 1,37,769 Tweeds 41,233 Govt. material 44,391 Synthetic Fabrics 27,532 Millionore 64,260 Shawls, blankets and Lois 11,587 Carpet yarn 44,411 In view of the above details, it is observed that out of the total worsted yarn manufactured at 585294 Kg., 288500 Kg. is of synthetic blended

MASCOT FOOTCARE FARIDABAD THRG ITS PARTNER GUNJAN LAKHANI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD (HARYANA)

The appeals stand dismissed

ITA/192/2012HC Punjab & Haryana12 May 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143(1)
Section 14A
Section 260
Section 36
Section 36(1)
Section 36(1)(iii)

disallowance has to be worked out on reasonable basis under Section 14 A . The method prescribed for the purpose of section 14A of the Act is contained in Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (“the Rules”). Rule 8D had been inserted vide Notification 45 of 2008 and has been held to be prospective in nature i.e. applicable from

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144Section 80

2) No information/details in respect of the share application money amounting to Rs.51,50,000/- received by the company was furnished. Hence, in the absence of records the same was treated as unexplained share application money and the same was added to the declared total income. (3) Addition of Rs.1,45,57,286/- was made as the assessee failed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MUKERIAN PAPERS LTD

ITA/408/2006HC Punjab & Haryana14 Nov 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 35DSection 37Section 37(1)Section 43(1)

2. In ITA No.408 of 2006 for the assessment year 1995-96, the Revenue raised the following substantial questions of law :- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.3,70,98,415/- on account of interest on borrowed funds paid