BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,055Delhi4,675Bangalore1,486Chennai1,365Kolkata1,109Ahmedabad671Jaipur474Hyderabad469Pune308Indore303Chandigarh238Surat238Raipur217Nagpur133Rajkot130Karnataka124Cochin123Amritsar121Visakhapatnam104Lucknow91Allahabad56Cuttack55Guwahati52SC45Calcutta41Jodhpur39Patna38Ranchi37Agra31Telangana31Kerala15Varanasi15Dehradun15Panaji15Jabalpur5Punjab & Haryana3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Himachal Pradesh1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Addition to Income2Disallowance2

BALJINDER SINGH SALANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

ITA/341/2018HC Punjab & Haryana24 Jan 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Section 142

disallowance of expenses on account of wages paid to labour and without any material on record against the assessee? (iii) Whether the ITAT has erred in applying the provision of section-44AD for calculating the net profit ratio at 8% of the gross receipt which was treated as income of the assesse? (iv) Whether net profit ratio of earlier years

M/S INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD., RAJP vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA & OR

ITA/129/2000HC Punjab & Haryana20 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh in ITA No.487/Chandi/1992 for the assessment year 1990-1991 disallowing the credit of Rs.89,854/- to the sister concerns on the specific ground that the advances given to the sisters concerns were not proved to be relating

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

44,310 13.64% 2. 1976-77 4,30,619 73,532 14.58% 3. 1977-78 3,71,193 72,971