BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 29clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,325Delhi6,235Bangalore2,189Chennai2,062Kolkata1,894Ahmedabad1,002Jaipur714Hyderabad693Pune533Indore421Chandigarh351Surat326Raipur282Rajkot234Karnataka224Amritsar186Lucknow174Cochin174Nagpur169Visakhapatnam143Agra116Cuttack87Guwahati71Panaji64Jodhpur64SC63Patna59Calcutta54Ranchi51Telangana50Allahabad46Dehradun34Varanasi26Kerala22Jabalpur12Punjab & Haryana7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Orissa3Rajasthan3MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 294Section 2(15)3Section 12A3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 802Section 143(3)2Section 69C2

CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD LUDHIANA vs. M/S CEIGALL INDIA LTD

ITA/61/2021HC Punjab & Haryana06 Aug 2022

Bench: Cit(A). The Same Was Partly Allowed. The Addition Made By Applying Net Profit Dinesh Kumar 2022.10.16 16:54 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 145(3)Section 260Section 29Section 40Section 69C

29 which states that the income from profits and gains of business shall be computed in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 30 to 43D of the Act. Section 40 provides for certain disallowances

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

Section 402
Deduction2
Exemption2
ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 36(1)(iii) on the amo ed for utilisation in purchase of sment orders dated 19.03.2001, ars 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 200 on assumptions and presumptio erefore, argument raised by lear Officer has given different t allowing the deduction of amo ed for the purpose of trading in view of the above, the reasonin d for the purpose

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

disallow the exemption. 15. We have considered the submissions. Discussion 16. Section 2 (15) of the Act defines charitable purpose. The word ‘charitable purpose’ and ‘legislative changes’ have been discussed at length VARINDER SINGH 2024.12.05 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment ITA No. 271 of 2014 -10- by the Larger Bench of the Supreme

BALJINDER SINGH SALANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

ITA/341/2018HC Punjab & Haryana24 Jan 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Section 142

29 ITA Nos.341 and 297 of 2018 (O & M) 2 2024:PHHC:015604-DB disallowance of expenses on account of wages paid to labour and without any material on record against the assessee? (iii) Whether the ITAT has erred in applying the provision of section

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/161/2016HC Punjab & Haryana17 Nov 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 260A

disallowance of exemption. 74. It cannot possibly be suggested that the Government of Punjab formed the trusts under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 because it wanted to carry on the business as colonizers or developers under the mask of the category “objects of general public utility”. PANKAJ BAWEJA 2018.09.20 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity

CIT CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER

ITA/351/2007HC Punjab & Haryana29 Jan 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260ASection 43BSection 80Section 80H

disallowance of claim for deduction u/s 80-I of the 1961 Act, in as much as the machineries had been installed in the same existing factory premises, as no mention of expansion of the existing factory in the annual report of the company was there and or any separate accounts & other details relating to unit for which deduction

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

29,754/- also included copper wire. However, the A.O found on enquiry that assessee had shown sale of old stores at Rs.1,55,821/- for which no details were given. The A.O personally visited the factory premises of the assessee-company alongwith Shri S.K.Gupta, Inspector on 20.03.1986 and found that there was no stock of copper wire in the godown