THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S TDS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT LTD

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Hon'Ble Itat Is Justified In Dismissing The Miscellaneous Application Of The Revenue Without Discussing The Merits Ignoring The Legislative Intent Expressed In Cbdt'S Anuradha 2020.02.12 17:37 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 27.3.2019 relating to assessment year 2014-2015 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Division Bench Chandigarh, in M.A. No. 50/Chd/2019 in ITA No. 656/Chd/2018 (Annxure A-4) claiming following questions of law :- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances

INDUSTRIAL CABLES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order dated 23.09.2004 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short ‘Tribunal’) for the Assessment Year 1995-96. 2. The appellant has raised two questions with respect to addition/deduction. The appellant claimed deduction of Rs.6,24,819/- with respect to expenses incurred

M/S INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD., RAJP vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA & OR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh in ITA No.487/Chandi/1992 for the assessment year 1990-1991 disallowing

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'Act 1961') challenging order dated 03.02.2005 (A/Y 96-97 in ITA No. 244-2005), order dated 31.01.2005 (A/Y 98-99 in ITA No. 281-2005), order dated 28.12.2004 (A/Y 96-97 in ITA No. 283-2005), order dated 28.12.2004 (A/Y 97-98 in ITA No. 282-2005) & order dated

M/S MAJESTIC AUTO LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF IT & ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order dated 28.02.2005 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short ‘Tribunal’) to the extent deduction of expenses incurred on expansion outside the country and warranty claim have been disallowed

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHD vs. M/S AGRI KING TRACTORS AND EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD.

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ?” Ii. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Itat Is Justified In Directing The Assessing Officer To Verify The Claim Of The Assessee Having Not Earned Any Exempt Income In The Year Under Consideration & Allow The Relief Accordingly, Ignoring The Legislative Intent Anuradha 2020.01.30 16:03 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(for short 'the Act') against the order dated 18.3.2019 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Division Bench Chandigarh, in ITA No. 1280/Chd/2018 (Annexure A-3) for A.Y. 2015- 2016 and claiming following substantial questions of law :- “i. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

260 Shawls, blankets and Lois 11,587 Carpet yarn 44,411 In view of the above details, it is observed that out of the total worsted yarn manufactured at 585294 Kg., 288500 Kg. is of synthetic blended yarn in which the wastage is nominal. Secondly, it has been emphasized by the assessee that for manufacture of fine quality of yarn