BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 26(1)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,021Delhi4,430Bangalore1,666Chennai1,261Kolkata1,132Ahmedabad927Jaipur628Hyderabad547Chandigarh350Indore319Pune299Raipur289Surat281Cochin204Amritsar177Rajkot159Karnataka152Nagpur140Cuttack127Visakhapatnam115Lucknow106Agra97Guwahati67Allahabad63SC49Telangana48Calcutta43Panaji43Jodhpur37Patna29Varanasi22Ranchi20Jabalpur18Kerala18Dehradun16Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Himachal Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Gauhati1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Section 115J4Section 260A3Section 2(15)3Section 12A3Addition to Income3Section 112Section 143(3)2Exemption

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 36(1)(iii) on rrowed for the purpose of purch nterest paid in respect of the cap s of M/s Vardhman Polytex Ltd (iii) was disallowed on the grou ere not sold for long time and t lytex Ltd were pledged with h an wed s on the were was ains

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

disallow the exemption. 15. We have considered the submissions. Discussion 16. Section 2 (15) of the Act defines charitable purpose. The word ‘charitable purpose’ and ‘legislative changes’ have been discussed at length VARINDER SINGH 2024.12.05 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment ITA No. 271 of 2014 -10- by the Larger Bench of the Supreme

2
Penalty2
Disallowance2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S PIYUSH COLONIZERS LTD.

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/300/2019HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)

26,39,400/- levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act without properly appreciating the facts of the case and without MANOJ KUMAR 2020.02.14 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court,Chandigarh ITA No. 300 of 2019 [2] specifying what was wrong with Assessing Officer's order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/161/2016HC Punjab & Haryana17 Nov 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 260A

26 of 2016, ITA Nos. 7, 42 and 99 of 2015 all titled as The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh vs. M/s Improvement Trust, Chhoti Baradari, Patiala. All the appeals have common facts, for convenience sake, facts are being taken from I.T.A. No.161 of 2016. 2. The Revenue has filed the appeal under Section 260A of Income

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S NHPC LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA/336/2015HC Punjab & Haryana20 Sept 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)Section 24Section 260ASection 28

III) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in ITA No. 2618/Del/2008 for Assessment Year 2005- 2006, claiming the following substantial questions of law:- 1. “Whether, on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was right in law in dismissing appeal

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JALANDHAR vs. M/S SUPERTECH FORGINGS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/101/2022HC Punjab & Haryana05 Sept 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 148 of the Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer, being not satisfied with the assessee reply, disallowed the entire purchases amounting to Rs.4,26,93,470/- holding as unverifiable purchases from the following parties:- Sr. No. Name of the concern Amount of purchases 1. Madan Lal Pahuja M/s. Shiv bholeKirpa Trade, Shivpuri, Ludhiana 1.05 Cr 2. Lovy Steel and Allied