BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 199clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai940Delhi883Bangalore281Kolkata234Chennai224Ahmedabad113Jaipur86Hyderabad84Chandigarh60Pune59Rajkot57Raipur45Indore44Lucknow38Calcutta38Jodhpur26Allahabad23Karnataka21Visakhapatnam18Cuttack15Cochin14Surat11Nagpur8Telangana7Amritsar5SC4Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana3Agra2Patna1Ranchi1Panaji1Orissa1Guwahati1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 112

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

199 (O&M) and other connected ca % only of the disallowance mad ven any reasons much less v allowance to 15% of the disallow CIT V. Palwal Co operative S &H), their Lordships of Punjab ery judicial and quasi judicial bo der which should reflect applic thority to the issues/points raised quirement of recording of reason egral part

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

disallowed to get benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’). ITA No. 33 of 2022 has been filed by the assessee arising out of order dated 12.11.2021 passed by the ITAT dismissing its ITA No.1426/Chd/2018 for the assessment year 2015-2016, upholding the order of the CIT (A) declaring the assessee not entitled

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

199 kgs x Rs.154.44) was made by the assessing officer in the net profit of the assessee treating the wastage as addition to closing stock or sales out of the books. That no defect was pointed out in the consumption or production register of the assessee or in the method of accounting regularly TRIPTI SAINI 2024.03.22 11:37 I attest