BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 154(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,558Delhi2,159Bangalore840Chennai546Kolkata519Ahmedabad293Jaipur244Indore211Pune208Hyderabad172Cochin140Chandigarh134Surat113Raipur109Lucknow102Nagpur101Agra78Visakhapatnam75Amritsar59Jodhpur44Guwahati43Karnataka42Rajkot41Calcutta41Cuttack29Allahabad24Patna24Telangana21Panaji17SC15Jabalpur11Kerala9Dehradun8Punjab & Haryana5Varanasi5Ranchi3Rajasthan2Gauhati1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14A8Section 1544Section 2602TDS2Disallowance2Deduction2Addition to Income2

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

154, for a efore the 1st day of April, 2001. of the said section that it refers nder Chapter IV. Section 14A wo the assessee has indivisible inco en computed in this case. We h of share of M/S Vardhman Poly refore, interest on borrowed mo wable as a deduction u/s 36(1)( tion is permissible to the asses

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA vs. M/S VENUS REMEDIES LIMITED

ITA/10/2024HC Punjab & Haryana02 Aug 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 115JSection 143Section 154

Section t ‘the Act, 1961’) accordingly. he case had a checkered history eedings where the assessee had CIT (Appeals) disallowing the 1961. It is submitted that the 1, are limited and the assessee correction in the original return ducted in the books of account Learned counsel submits that he Karnataka High Court was y dismissal

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHD vs. M/S AGRI KING TRACTORS AND EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD.

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/356/2019HC Punjab & Haryana29 Jan 2020

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ?” Ii. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Itat Is Justified In Directing The Assessing Officer To Verify The Claim Of The Assessee Having Not Earned Any Exempt Income In The Year Under Consideration & Allow The Relief Accordingly, Ignoring The Legislative Intent Anuradha 2020.01.30 16:03 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 14ASection 260

1. This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(for short 'the Act') against the order dated 18.3.2019 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Division Bench Chandigarh, in ITA No. 1280/Chd/2018 (Annexure A-3) for A.Y. 2015- 2016 and claiming following substantial questions of law :- “i. Whether on the facts

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144Section 80

1) During the assessment proceedings, the identity and creditworthiness of the parties subscribed share capital remained unproved and the genuineness of the transaction was also unproved, therefore, the capital of Rs.55,00,000/- was treated as income from undisclosed sources of the assessee’s company. (2) No information/details in respect of the share application money amounting to Rs.51

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S TDS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT LTD

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/382/2019HC Punjab & Haryana06 Feb 2020

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Hon'Ble Itat Is Justified In Dismissing The Miscellaneous Application Of The Revenue Without Discussing The Merits Ignoring The Legislative Intent Expressed In Cbdt'S Anuradha 2020.02.12 17:37 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 14ASection 260

1 (SC) and upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 91 Taxmann.com 154 (SC) ? (vi) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is justified in dismissing the Miscellaneous application of the Revenue and not deciding the merits, whereas the disallowances wa restricted by Ld. CIT (A) to the extent except income