BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 145(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,835Delhi1,472Kolkata485Chennai430Bangalore406Jaipur390Ahmedabad373Surat215Hyderabad196Chandigarh146Agra124Pune107Raipur100Cochin99Indore95Rajkot82Lucknow70Cuttack68Amritsar66Visakhapatnam56Allahabad54Ranchi45Nagpur43Calcutta39Karnataka33Jodhpur28Telangana27SC18Patna18Dehradun15Varanasi10Panaji10Guwahati7Jabalpur6Punjab & Haryana4Himachal Pradesh3H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 294Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 1432Section 143(3)2Section 69C2Section 402

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

ITR/3/2010HC Punjab & Haryana22 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 256(2)

145 of the IT Act, the said addition was completely unsustainable. iv) It was further submitted by the learned Sr. counsel that the only reason for addition of Rs.2,15,150/- made under Section 41(2) of the IT Act appeared to be the desire of the Assessing Officer that the company ought to have dug out undergrounds cables even

CIT-I CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PB.INFO&COMM. TECH. CORP. LTD. CHD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/398/2009HC Punjab & Haryana18 Jan 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 271

2) was issued on 07.10.2004. After seeking relevant details and information from the respondent, its assessment for the concerned year was finalized. It was observed that the assessee had treated the money received by sale of plots/sheds as capital receipt and had not accounted for the closing stock of plots/sheds due to which revenue on these accounts was MANJU

BALJINDER SINGH SALANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

ITA/341/2018HC Punjab & Haryana24 Jan 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Section 142

disallowance of expenses on account of wages paid to labour and without any material on record against the assessee? (iii) Whether the ITAT has erred in applying the provision of section-44AD for calculating the net profit ratio at 8% of the gross receipt which was treated as income of the assesse? (iv) Whether net profit ratio of earlier years

CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD LUDHIANA vs. M/S CEIGALL INDIA LTD

ITA/61/2021HC Punjab & Haryana06 Aug 2022

Bench: Cit(A). The Same Was Partly Allowed. The Addition Made By Applying Net Profit Dinesh Kumar 2022.10.16 16:54 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 145(3)Section 260Section 29Section 40Section 69C

145(3) of the Act. Addition was made by applying net provide rate @ 12% on total gross receipt. Further addition under Section 69C of the Act was made on account unexplained expenditure. 3. Aggrieved by the order passed by Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before CIT(A). The same was partly