BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 133clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,537Delhi2,092Kolkata849Bangalore566Ahmedabad367Chennai336Jaipur301Surat194Chandigarh157Pune149Indore146Hyderabad122Raipur99Cochin81Lucknow76Rajkot72Visakhapatnam56Cuttack51Nagpur45Calcutta42Amritsar39Guwahati37Agra36Allahabad32Karnataka27Patna20Telangana20Ranchi19Varanasi11SC11Dehradun11Jodhpur6Panaji4Jabalpur4Punjab & Haryana2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Kerala1Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1432

LALIT SINGLA R/O SARAI ALBEL SINGH OUTSIDE LAHORI GATE PATIALA PUNJAB vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TEX PATIALA PUNJAB

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/111/2018HC Punjab & Haryana02 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI

Section 133Section 142Section 143Section 156Section 206CSection 260ASection 40Section 40A(3)

disallowance can be made without appreciating the chargeability of transactions to tax by way of TCS forms in accordance with Section 206CA r.w. Rule 114A substantiating the purchases made and the genuineness thereof ? 3 . A few facts necessary for adjudication of the instant appeal as narrated therein may be noticed. The assessee is in the business of retail selling

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

disallowed both the claims of the assessee-Company, vide order dated 26.02.1999 (A-1). Feeling aggrieved against the above order, the appellant- Company preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the same was partly allowed on 11.08.1999 (A-2) by allowing the claim of the assessee i.e qua the travelling expenditure as well as fees