PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S NHPC LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present : Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate for the respondent . *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This order shall dispose of ITA Nos.336, 362 and 367 of 2015 as according to the learned counsel for the appellant-revenue, the Anuradha 2019.09.25 11:40 I attest to the accuracy

CIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Kavita, Advocate for Income Tax Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short

C I T vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Kavita, Advocate for Income Tax Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short

MASCOT FOOTCARE FARIDABAD THRG ITS PARTNER GUNJAN LAKHANI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD (HARYANA)

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Pankaj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shakti Singh, Advocate for the appellant (s). Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Standing counsel for the respondent-department. *** Ritu Bahri, J. 1. This judgment shall dispose of the above mentioned two appeals together, as common questions of law and facts are involved therein. However, for facility of reference, the facts

CIT CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dugga, Advocate with Ms. Kavita, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking

INDUSTRIAL CABLES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate for respondent-Income Tax Department *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Sectio 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order dated 23.09.2004 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

M/S MAJESTIC AUTO LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF IT & ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Mr. Viren Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for respondent-Income Tax *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant petition under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order dated 28.02.2005 passed by Income

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA GAURAV ARORA 2023.04.21 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/document P&H HC, Chandigarh ITA Nos. 244, 281, 282, 283 & 630 of 2005 2023:PHHC:056092-DB 2 Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate & Mr. Nishant Mishra, Advocate for the appellant (s). Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Standing

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate, for the Assessee. Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel, for the Revenue. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. These are two sets of Income Tax Appeals. ITA Nos. 52, 164 of 2017; 48, 61 of 2020; 196, 197, 199; and 200 of 2023 have been filed by the Revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present : Mr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue Mr. K.L. Goyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Umang Goyal, Advocate for the respondent (in ITA No.161 of 2016) Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for the respondent (in ITA Nos.7, 42 & 99 of 2015 and ITA No. 26 of 2016) * * * AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. This order shall dispose of five appeals

BHARTI BHUSHAN JINDAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, for the respondent. ***** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. 1. The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), for Assessment Year 2004-2005 is preferred against order dated 13.07.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dugga, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I LUDHIANA vs. M/S VERDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. LUDHIANA

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ishan Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent. **** Ritu Bahri, J. (oral) The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 31.03.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, whereby appeal filed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LTD.(NOW GLAXO SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD.)

Appeal stands disposed of

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Counsel and for appellant-Income Tax Department Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate(through V.C.) Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISHT Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate, and Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. These are seven appeals which have been taken up together for adjudication. However, the facts have been taken from

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA vs. M/S VENUS REMEDIES LIMITED

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SAN Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standin Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Ju for the appellant(s). *** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Appeal No.10-2024, Appeal N ng dealt with together as comm he same. Facts are being extracte NJAB AND HARYANA ARH ITA-10-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.08.2024 ANCHKULA …Appellant …Respondent ITA-11-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision

M/S SHREE DIGVIJAYA WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMT-TAX, AMRITSAR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate and Mr. Sidhant Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondent-Income Tax Department. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. 1. The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court vide its order dated 23.08.2007 under Section 256(2) of the Income