BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 63clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,654Delhi1,423Bangalore519Chennai478Kolkata289Ahmedabad277Jaipur145Hyderabad113Pune85Chandigarh70Raipur67Indore62Surat44Karnataka42Ranchi39Lucknow39Visakhapatnam35SC28Cochin25Rajkot24Cuttack21Amritsar16Nagpur15Telangana12Guwahati11Allahabad7Jodhpur6Patna6Dehradun5Calcutta3Agra2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1Panaji1Orissa1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Kerala1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 80I7Section 294Section 69C3Section 43Section 143(3)2Section 402Section 35(2)2Depreciation2Disallowance

CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD LUDHIANA vs. M/S CEIGALL INDIA LTD

ITA/61/2021HC Punjab & Haryana06 Aug 2022

Bench: Cit(A). The Same Was Partly Allowed. The Addition Made By Applying Net Profit Dinesh Kumar 2022.10.16 16:54 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 145(3)Section 260Section 29Section 40Section 69C

63,82,490/- was assessed and enhanced to Rs.8,21,93,828/-. Books of the accounts were rejected under Section 145(3) of the Act. Addition was made by applying net provide rate @ 12% on total gross receipt. Further addition under Section 69C of the Act was made on account unexplained expenditure. 3. Aggrieved by the order passed by Assessing

2
Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, CHD vs. M/S VENUS REMEDIES LTD.

ITA/81/2012HC Punjab & Haryana25 Jul 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 33BSection 35(2)Section 4Section 69CSection 80Section 80I

63,04,928/-, Capital Expen Rs.3,00,67,328/- and deferred r research u/s 35(2) of Rs.1,55,3 purposes of determining deducti NJAB AND HARYANA ARH ITA-81-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.07.2024 …Appellant …Respondent NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH or the appellant. ) .03.2014, for determination on he circumstances of the case, the lding the decision