MANGE RAM MITTAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

147 have date of commencemen requisition], on the ba (b) where returns of incom 139 Thor in response section (1) of sectio assessments have no search or requisition disclosed in such retur (c) where the due date fo expired, but no return (A) on the basis of e of account and the normal cour search or requi in computation falling

M/S KING EXPORTS THRU MADAN LAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed; (ca) where a return of income has not been furnished by the assessee or a return of income has been furnished by him and on the basis of information or document received from the prescribed income-tax authority, under sub-section (2) of section 133C, it is noticed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I LUDHIANA vs. M/S VERDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. LUDHIANA

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

147 of the Income Tax Act, issued notice to the assessee under Section 148 of the Act. During the course of reassessment proceedings, the reasons recorded for reopening were served upon the assessee. Vide letter dated 22.01.2010, the assessee raised objection alleging it to be a review of the earlier decision of the Assessing Officer. The second objection