PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD vs. M/S NHPC LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present : Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate for the respondent . *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This order shall dispose of ITA Nos.336, 362 and 367 of 2015 as according to the learned counsel for the appellant-revenue, the Anuradha 2019.09.25 11:40 I attest to the accuracy

INDUSTRIAL CABLES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate for respondent-Income Tax Department *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Sectio 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order dated 23.09.2004 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

C I T vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dugga, Advocate with for the appellant Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LTD

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dugga, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘1961 Act’) is seeking setting aside of order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I LUDHIANA vs. M/S VERDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. LUDHIANA

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ishan Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent. **** Ritu Bahri, J. (oral) The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 31.03.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, whereby appeal filed

C I T vs. M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HELATHCARE LTD.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Kavita, Advocate for Income Tax Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the assessee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant through instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short

MANGE RAM MITTAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SAN Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advoc Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Dr. Deepa Mr. Yugank Goyal, Advocates, in ITA No. 51 of 2007 and for th in ITA No. 243 of 2008. Mr. Sanay Bansal, Senior Advoc Mr. Gauri Neo Rampal, Senior S Appellant in ITA No. 243 of 200 In ITA No. 51 of 2007. *** PRAKASH SHARMA, J. two appeals