BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 8clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,199Chennai3,159Delhi2,570Kolkata1,661Pune1,517Bangalore1,435Ahmedabad1,041Hyderabad1,039Jaipur775Patna672Surat514Chandigarh467Nagpur405Raipur396Visakhapatnam389Indore378Lucknow309Amritsar309Cochin308Karnataka274Rajkot260Cuttack193Panaji150Agra104Dehradun85Guwahati76Calcutta75Jodhpur61SC58Ranchi47Telangana44Allahabad44Jabalpur40Varanasi31Orissa10Andhra Pradesh9Rajasthan9Kerala7Punjab & Haryana5Himachal Pradesh5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 2633Section 54B3Section 54F2Section 1482Exemption2Condonation of Delay2

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

ITA/317/2019HC Punjab & Haryana30 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 260A

8. ITA No. 345 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 9. ITA No. 390 of 2019 (O&M) Gurinderjit Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present:- Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate, and Mr. Shivansh Pandya

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

ITA/221/2023HC Punjab & Haryana06 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 148

delay of 84 days and 71 days in re-filing of the respective appeals is hereby condoned. ITA-221-2023 (O&M) and ITA-223-2023 (O&M) 5. This order shall dispose of two connected Income Tax Appeals as the issue involved in both the Appeals is common. 6. These Appeals are preferred by the appellant(s) assailing

PCIT ROHTAK vs. MS DIN DAYAL PURUSHOTAM LAL

ITA/110/2024HC Punjab & Haryana16 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 263Section 263(1)

delay is condoned. the order of the Income Tax decided by a common order in 6 and 2017-18. 4 ) t t ) t t f x n MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.17 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-110-2024(O 2. The Re be sub cancell Income 3. We hav ITAT w settled section

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

ITA/56/2020HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260Section 54B

Section 54B of the Act. 5. The contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant lacks merit. 6. It is an undisputed fact that after selling the agricultural land the appellant purchased a land worth his share, in the name of his wife. The issue is directly covered by the decision of this Court in Dinesh Verma's case (supra

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 54F

condonation of wed and accordingly delay is con -2023 Exemption application is allowed esent appeal assails the order pas n the Tribunal has held as under: “5. On the other hand, t assessee supporting the order pas submitted that since the order pass based on the provisions of law and udgement of the Hon'ble Gujarat H Leena Jugal Kishore